This has got me stumped. We are conducting loop check on shielded power cables that are in present service. There are some discontinuities in the shield of the cable which were bonded only now, long after the cables were put in service. It is for this reason that loop checking on the shield is being conducted. On some of the cables, the loop check confirmed the continuity of the shield (about 0.3 ohms on a digital ohmmeter. On other cables a reading of 1kilohm to 3kilohms registered. The contractor insists that there is "continuity", but we are not about to accept and we are of the opinion that the bonding at some points were not satisfactory.
It was found out that even with the cables deenergized and isolated, there is an AC voltage presence in the order of 2 to 4 volts--something that the contractor claims interferes with the continuity check and is responsible for the high resistance.
What do you think can be responsible for the voltage even if the cable has been repeatedly discharged? Can it really interfere in the continuity check?
The cables run about 900 meters along the carriageway of an elevated railway system and are used for DC traction power supply.
TIA
It was found out that even with the cables deenergized and isolated, there is an AC voltage presence in the order of 2 to 4 volts--something that the contractor claims interferes with the continuity check and is responsible for the high resistance.
What do you think can be responsible for the voltage even if the cable has been repeatedly discharged? Can it really interfere in the continuity check?
The cables run about 900 meters along the carriageway of an elevated railway system and are used for DC traction power supply.
TIA