Sanman1966UK
Electrical
- May 22, 2004
- 4
The old problem I think - Your socket outlets are two close together and of opposite phases.
I am of the opinion that the above BS clause is applicable and only for where maintenance is being carried out. However I do agree that we all have a duty to minmise any danger and to this end I have ensured that a 1 phase to 1 desk philosophy is mainatained.
The checking consultant (CC) is of the opinion that whilst outstretched and holding a screwdriver he will be able to touch an adjacent socket with his big toe (exageration).
Are there any rules of thumb for when a ajacent outlet places a risk on a person working on an open outlet with live parts?
So, even if the CC is correct, what is the correct method of dealing with this issue? would placing a warning notice in the rear of the socket, which is ajacent an opposite phase, thus having to remove a socket outlet with a warning notice prior to accessing the second adjacent enclosure/outlet be sufficent?
I am of the opinion that the above BS clause is applicable and only for where maintenance is being carried out. However I do agree that we all have a duty to minmise any danger and to this end I have ensured that a 1 phase to 1 desk philosophy is mainatained.
The checking consultant (CC) is of the opinion that whilst outstretched and holding a screwdriver he will be able to touch an adjacent socket with his big toe (exageration).
Are there any rules of thumb for when a ajacent outlet places a risk on a person working on an open outlet with live parts?
So, even if the CC is correct, what is the correct method of dealing with this issue? would placing a warning notice in the rear of the socket, which is ajacent an opposite phase, thus having to remove a socket outlet with a warning notice prior to accessing the second adjacent enclosure/outlet be sufficent?