Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

water cooling

Status
Not open for further replies.

zauvijek

Petroleum
Sep 17, 2007
1
Please, can anybody direct me to some materials / experiences for the case when during the well testing quantity of some 4 000 m3 of water/day has to be cooled from cca 85 C to 20 C before it is discarded to surface natural waters
Thank you
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

hmmm- intersting problem! the obvious place to go for expereicne with this owuld be the testing companies- Schlumberger, Geoservices, etc.
 
hmmm- intersting problem! the obvious place to go for expereicne with this would be the testing companies- Schlumberger, Geoservices, etc.
 
If the water is clean (ready to be discarded) and the "natural waters" is colder than 20 deg C - then why not just "premix" it with these "natural waters". Lay out a hose and pump up the water and mix it so that the resulting temperature is 20 deg c?

Best regards

Morten
 
Air coolers would be used to lower the temperature, then something else depending on ambient.

A cooling tower or evaporation pond would work.

I believe your problem will be mineral deposites. As the water cools, you will precipitate minerals, if the water as them, an most produced waters do.
 
That is a bunch of water and an awful lot of heat rejection.

The heat works out to 2.6E8 kJ (2464 MMBTU/day or the equivalent heat of 2.5 MMCF/d of methane). I don't know any "quick and dirty" way to get rid of that much heat. If you have a bunch of surface water (i.e. offshore) then you could design a specific water-water heat exchanger to pump a few million m^3/day through one side to result in your produced water being at the right temp without the heat exchanger exhaust being too hot.

I recently designed an evaporation pond for 1/5 that much water and the pond surface was 75m X 75m. I don't think that you're going to be successful rejecting the heat to atmosphere.

David
 
I just realized that I used 1 cal/gm-C when I meant to use 4.18 J/gm-C. Call it 10,7E8 J, 10,102 MMBTU, and 10 MMCF/d of Methane equivalent.

David
 
If this is an ongoing produced-water disposal problem, suggest you look at a binary-cycle power generation plant such as ORMAT (Israeli I think). These systems use Propane or Ammonia as the power fluid and don't recall the OA efficiency but would think that you could generate quite a few MWe. $100/BBL for your oil and $10/BBL for your water?

Aside from capital cost, a problem you may run into is Calcium Carnonate/Barium Sulphate etc precipitating out in the heat exchangers as the temperature drops.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor