Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SSS148 on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Water Distribution

Status
Not open for further replies.

mflam

Civil/Environmental
Apr 12, 2005
30
I work for an old New England town. Lots of ledge, elevation change and dense overgrowth.
We want to eliminate some dead ends in the water distribution system. If I have two 8-inch dead ends about 400 feet apart, tough field conditions. There is plenty of fire flow at both ends.
Instead of 8-inch CLDI, I'm considering connecting the two dead ends with 4-inch HDPE.
Comments, pro and con, please.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

is this just to circulate water and reduce flushing? 4" will probably work for that. However, you will still need to trench through the ledge, trees and steep terrain - so your main savings is in reduced number of fittings and thrust restraints.
 
Or are you looking at directional drilling for the installation and that is why you are looking at hdpe? As cvg said, 4-inch should be adequate for circulating the water if you are not relying on it to increase fire flows.
 
The main purpose of "looping" water mains is not to provide circulation, although that is one benefit. Rather, lines are looped or gridded to increase reliability. In your case, each dead end 8-inch line might be expected to provide a fire flow of between 500 gpm to 1000 gpm. If the two are looped with an 8-inch the flow could be nearly doubled. But, more important, even if one line was out of service for some reason you would still be able to provide close to the 500-1000 gpm fire flow.

My suggestion would be to connect the two lines with an 8-inch, materials could be DI, PVC, maybe PE or any other allowed in your system.

good luck
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor