dsmattman
Mechanical
- Aug 16, 2013
- 1
Working on loading small CAT forklifts etc into intermodal containers.
Four wheeled vehicle; weight 10K or less
Per wheel is 1’ x .84’= .84 sqft per wheel x 4 =3.36 total sqft
10k / 3.36 is 2976.20 lbs per sqft
my boss (not an engineer) tell me that I do not have this right. That the frame and axle of the CAT distributes the weight and the actually lbs per sqft is the total size (width times length) by weight and not the contact point (wheels). I need to hear if I'm right or him right? He used the idea that a arch can support a bridge up and strong due to the design and does most of the distribution of weight. Or that a 25 pound weight in your hand is supported by my entire arm and core not just my hand. I do not believe this relates BUT must be delicate when handling ones upper management.... PLEASE HELP,
Another question is if I stick two 2x6x8 under the wheels of this CAT how can I figure out how much weight I'm actually distributing, what is my new lbs per sqft. It isn't truly evenly distributed. In the end I believe I will be building a pallet that they can drive on to then secure.
random thought;;;
My railroad has a rule that says lading cannot be more than 300 lbs per sqft. The AAR (association of america railroads) only has a rule about 25,000 lbs per 10 linear feet. Other class one railroads restrict it down to 2500 lbs per linear foot, and one has told me that their rule of thumb is no more than 625 lbs per sqft. I cannot find any data or facts to support any thing but the 25,000 per 10 linear feet due to floor rating on most containers. No one in my company can even tell me why or where the 300 lbs per square foot came from. We ship millions of containers today that have a larger foot print than 300 lbs per square foot without a issue.
Four wheeled vehicle; weight 10K or less
Per wheel is 1’ x .84’= .84 sqft per wheel x 4 =3.36 total sqft
10k / 3.36 is 2976.20 lbs per sqft
my boss (not an engineer) tell me that I do not have this right. That the frame and axle of the CAT distributes the weight and the actually lbs per sqft is the total size (width times length) by weight and not the contact point (wheels). I need to hear if I'm right or him right? He used the idea that a arch can support a bridge up and strong due to the design and does most of the distribution of weight. Or that a 25 pound weight in your hand is supported by my entire arm and core not just my hand. I do not believe this relates BUT must be delicate when handling ones upper management.... PLEASE HELP,
Another question is if I stick two 2x6x8 under the wheels of this CAT how can I figure out how much weight I'm actually distributing, what is my new lbs per sqft. It isn't truly evenly distributed. In the end I believe I will be building a pallet that they can drive on to then secure.
random thought;;;
My railroad has a rule that says lading cannot be more than 300 lbs per sqft. The AAR (association of america railroads) only has a rule about 25,000 lbs per 10 linear feet. Other class one railroads restrict it down to 2500 lbs per linear foot, and one has told me that their rule of thumb is no more than 625 lbs per sqft. I cannot find any data or facts to support any thing but the 25,000 per 10 linear feet due to floor rating on most containers. No one in my company can even tell me why or where the 300 lbs per square foot came from. We ship millions of containers today that have a larger foot print than 300 lbs per square foot without a issue.