sollapalooza
Mechanical
- Feb 28, 2014
- 13
Hello all,
Recently I have modified a splice connection between 2 structural members of a supported cone roof, changed it to weld connection. However, what kind of NDT is compulsory on this weld? Section 8.1.1 do not say anything regarding weld of structural members;
8.1.1 Application
Radiographic examination is required for shell butt-welds (see 8.1.2.2, 8.1.2.3, and 8.1.2.4), annular-plate butt-welds
(see 8.1.2.9), and flush-type connections with butt-welds (see 5.7.8.11). Radiographic examination is not required for
the following: roof-plate welds, bottom-plate welds, welds joining the top angle to either the roof or shell, welds joining
the shell plate to the bottom plate, welds in nozzle and manway necks made from plate, or appurtenance welds to the
tank.
Thanks in advance
EDIT: Upon checking with Annex T:
MT is required for Permanent attachment welds and temporary weld removal areas on Group IV, IVA, V, and VI materials, unless tested by liquid penetrant, or vice versa. The members are S275 beam, falls under Group IV.
Is it safe to assume MT/PT is adequate, without RT?
Recently I have modified a splice connection between 2 structural members of a supported cone roof, changed it to weld connection. However, what kind of NDT is compulsory on this weld? Section 8.1.1 do not say anything regarding weld of structural members;
8.1.1 Application
Radiographic examination is required for shell butt-welds (see 8.1.2.2, 8.1.2.3, and 8.1.2.4), annular-plate butt-welds
(see 8.1.2.9), and flush-type connections with butt-welds (see 5.7.8.11). Radiographic examination is not required for
the following: roof-plate welds, bottom-plate welds, welds joining the top angle to either the roof or shell, welds joining
the shell plate to the bottom plate, welds in nozzle and manway necks made from plate, or appurtenance welds to the
tank.
Thanks in advance
EDIT: Upon checking with Annex T:
MT is required for Permanent attachment welds and temporary weld removal areas on Group IV, IVA, V, and VI materials, unless tested by liquid penetrant, or vice versa. The members are S275 beam, falls under Group IV.
Is it safe to assume MT/PT is adequate, without RT?