Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations SDETERS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

What is an optimal configuration of (neodymium)magnets for induction. 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

gowan

Geotechnical
Oct 23, 2010
3
I'm making a geophone, a seismic sensor.
My plan is to get a 3/4" diameter by 1" neodymium round bar magnet. Then surround it with a collar with a space sufficient to accept a thin plastic cylinder wound with speaker wire.
I notice that in the commercial versions, the wire is wound at the top 1/4 and the bottom 1/4 of the cylinder.
Also, it seems that a 3/4" by 1" cylinder is available, but I would have to buy the outer collar in sections.
I anticipate the movement of the cylindar with the coil(s)
will be typically 1 - 2 mm. (mixing my lenght units)
Should the induction coils be totally inside the the space between the two magnets, or should 1/3 or 1/2 of the coil extend out of the air space? I'm guessing it should be centered in the area of the greatest concentration of flux.
Upon trying this project, I realize that I know little of magnetic circuits,, Where to position the magnets to get a condensed area of flux into which to put the induction coil(s) All help and redirection is most appreciated!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

My apologies for my previous post.
There is a lot of info I can get on the web which would make the post sound better. Now I see it is an incoherent mess.
I see that what I was trying to describe is a speaker driver, running in reverse.
I found the following software which should help me learn some.
Thanks
 
"incoherent mess"! Exactly the words I would have used. But we are such a nice bunch that we don't. Good that you found means to build understanding.

Gunnar Englund
--------------------------------------
100 % recycled posting: Electrons, ideas, finger-tips have been used over and over again...
 
I assume there will be a more coherent version coming. To help that along, let me add a few things:

What's the outer collar made of? Which way is the magnet poled?

And you should generally make the coil overlong. Helps mechanically and magnetically.
 
In my ignorance, I thought the outer coller would also be a magnet with the poles opposit to those of the inner core.
I thought this would concentrate the flux through the coil, expecially if I could put a smaller coil at each end. It was intuitive to me that this would generate the largest voltage for the smallest movement. My intuitions are fallable I have found.
Thanks for the response Peter
 
FEMM is a very good, powerful, easy-to-use electromagnetic software, with a little bit of a learning curve. The commands can be invoked either with menu's or from Matlab.
There is a very active and helpful user group:

It is limited to 2-D geometry.

=====================================
(2B)+(2B)' ?
 
If you want the beast to be reasonably linear in operation over a reasonable range of travel, you need a uniform radial magnetic field over a suitable length.

And either the stationary field, or the moving coil, one needs to be very much longer than the other.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor