IJR
Structural
- Dec 23, 2000
- 774
This one has always been a gray area to me.
You have a steel frame with joists to form a floor structure and you top it with trapezoidal deck and concrete topping.
In a seismic area I would utilize diaphragm action for better load distribution between frames. I would do this by using shear studs. This also gets me some composite action.
When seismic or wind load is not dominant I would simply brace the floor with horizontal bracing and I would ignore studs. The deck will be in place with the simple "nail " kind of fasteners. The braces distributes the load just like a diaphragm would at a lesser cost.
When no lateral load is available and I am relaxed with the stiffnesses of my sway frames and about sure that they have almost proportional sway stiffness, I would ignore bracing.
How do my friends approach this subject?
Regards
IJR
You have a steel frame with joists to form a floor structure and you top it with trapezoidal deck and concrete topping.
In a seismic area I would utilize diaphragm action for better load distribution between frames. I would do this by using shear studs. This also gets me some composite action.
When seismic or wind load is not dominant I would simply brace the floor with horizontal bracing and I would ignore studs. The deck will be in place with the simple "nail " kind of fasteners. The braces distributes the load just like a diaphragm would at a lesser cost.
When no lateral load is available and I am relaxed with the stiffnesses of my sway frames and about sure that they have almost proportional sway stiffness, I would ignore bracing.
How do my friends approach this subject?
Regards
IJR