mscpro
Aerospace
- Feb 1, 2009
- 8
I have a bracket modeled with shell elements which is constrained on one end and loaded on the other. I also have defined the elastic and plastic data for aluminum material, with the last two data points defined such that the slope is perfectly plastic after 4% true strain.
I noticed that when I examine the von-mises stress results the peak stress is at the peak defined stress level in my my material data. However, when I look at the S11 stress component (which is in the direction of the loading), the maximum stress is significantly higher than the peak stress defined in my material plastic stress-strain curve. I was expecting the calculated peak S11 stress to be at or below the peak stress in my material data (not higher!).
I understand that for linear statics analysis the computed strains are used with the constitutive material model to recover the stresses, and as such I was expecting something similar, with S11 to not be higher than the stress level defined in my material data.
Am I missing something? Can anyone shed some light on this?
Thanks.
I noticed that when I examine the von-mises stress results the peak stress is at the peak defined stress level in my my material data. However, when I look at the S11 stress component (which is in the direction of the loading), the maximum stress is significantly higher than the peak stress defined in my material plastic stress-strain curve. I was expecting the calculated peak S11 stress to be at or below the peak stress in my material data (not higher!).
I understand that for linear statics analysis the computed strains are used with the constitutive material model to recover the stresses, and as such I was expecting something similar, with S11 to not be higher than the stress level defined in my material data.
Am I missing something? Can anyone shed some light on this?
Thanks.