srijey
Mechanical
- Jul 24, 2002
- 46
Why in some jurisdictions (Alberta) 95% of emergency relief capacity is to be smokeless when it's more than 450 Btu/ cu ft? Is there any evidence that the emission level becomes unacceptable if above Ringelmann smoke chart #1? I mean other than nuisance or colour in atmosphere, any harmful effect due to this smoke after Ringelmann #1? What makes the regulatory body decide that 'smokeless' capacity requirement for a hydrocarbon flare stack?