Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Wood Truss Chord Members Effective Length

Status
Not open for further replies.

jay156

Structural
Apr 9, 2009
104
0
0
US
I have a project where I'm checking some garage attic trusses that were modified by a contractor to fit in some stairs.

My question though is about the top chords of the trusses and their effective lengths. For out of plane buckling, is it correct to assume that the top chord is braced by the roof sheathing, giving a K value less than one?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

If it's actually a wood truss there is a CT factor in the NDS that may have been used by the original manufacturer.

My impression is that the truss top chord is typically considered braced by the sheathing, weak axis for sure, and probably strong axis as well, (rather presumes an appropriate bracing system). I'd suggest you review the NDS on the subject as the language can be a bit murky.

Truss_shop_detail_calc_-_Alpine_csucmb.jpg


If you can see where they indicate braced length in this calc, you're doing better than I am. I see forces and a combined stress index (CSI) but the actual guts of the allowable stresses I don't see.

Again, if they are actually trusses and you can identify the manufacturer, I'd send the as-built to them and see if they are willing to modify/redesign. These are proprietary and the design can be difficult to model without their software, especially if you are trying to do it efficiently.

Regards,
Brian
 
It specifically indicates that at a minimum there needs to be purlins attached to the top chord at 24" o/c. To me that means they're considering it braced at 24" o/c for top chord design.
 
It might be a default in their software, as there is roof sheathing on the top chord in this particular case. They did some strange stuff elsewhere, substituted these goofy 6' long "trusses" to replace the 2x10s in the corridor. Quality of design fluctuates. There's no purlins that I know of on that roof. This is probably not the best reference drawing but it's what I had on hand.

Let's not discuss what they did with the parapets.
 
The software considers the TC as continually braced if plywood is attached. But only in the weak axis.

I don't mind telling you what I know if you want to email some drawings:

rsitruss at yahoo dot com
 
Yeah, braced weak axis for sure. It would be a rare, common truss chord that could survive without that. As an EOR checking something like this, I'd be inclined to use the distance between panel points as the unbraced length so long as as any splices are located fairly near to panel points.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top