chaboche
Mechanical
- Jun 11, 2007
- 35
Is it still possible to perform an assessment to DNV using working stress design? I understand that the new code DNV-OS-C101 uses limit state design instead.
I am looking at lifting of a component. These are the factors that I have come up with:
Using the working stress design method:
- 1.2 DAF
- 1.35 consequence factor
- 0.8 factor on Von-Mises stress.
Using the limit state design method:
- 1.2 DAF
- 1.3 consequence factor
- 1.3 load factor
- 1.15 material factor
If I combine these factors:
working stress design:
1.2x1.35/0.8 = 2.02
limit state design:
1.2x1.3x1.3x1.15 = 2.3
For the assessment I had in mind, it would appear to be advantageous to use the older working state design as it allows more onerous stresses. I am aware that I am being overly simplistic in my comparison and would welcome your comments.
I am looking at lifting of a component. These are the factors that I have come up with:
Using the working stress design method:
- 1.2 DAF
- 1.35 consequence factor
- 0.8 factor on Von-Mises stress.
Using the limit state design method:
- 1.2 DAF
- 1.3 consequence factor
- 1.3 load factor
- 1.15 material factor
If I combine these factors:
working stress design:
1.2x1.35/0.8 = 2.02
limit state design:
1.2x1.3x1.3x1.15 = 2.3
For the assessment I had in mind, it would appear to be advantageous to use the older working state design as it allows more onerous stresses. I am aware that I am being overly simplistic in my comparison and would welcome your comments.