Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

WRC-297 STATUS

Status
Not open for further replies.
lps123

lps123

Mechanical
Mar 11, 2015
5
AU
PREVIOUS THREAD REFERENCE: thread794-318482

My question is did WRC-537 include the findings from WRC-297? or was WRC-537 just a better quality print of WRC-107?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sort by date Sort by votes
537 was just 107 with digitized curves. No technical were made.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Thanks TGS4. If that is the case, we are planning to purchase a new copy of WRC-537 soon, but should be still fine to do calculations based on WRC-107. Its a shame that they didn't incorporate WRC-297 to WRC-537 issue.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

Champ58
  • Locked
  • Question
WRC-537 Calculation
Replies
2
Views
17
JStephen
JStephen
MechStruct1
  • Locked
  • Question
WRC 537 Radial Load Sign (+/-)
Replies
6
Views
12
MechStruct1
MechStruct1
mechengineer
  • Locked
  • Question
It is not within the limits of WRC 297, but FEA may not be required.
Replies
0
Views
3
mechengineer
mechengineer
sarawana
  • Locked
  • Question
WRC 107 PERFORMANCE FOR LIFTING TRUNNION 2
Replies
2
Views
5
sarawana
sarawana
waliq
  • Locked
  • Question
WRC 107 support lugs 1
Replies
9
Views
10
waliq
waliq

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top