Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations The Obturator on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Y connected auto-transformer for 600V or 690V to 480V

Status
Not open for further replies.

MatthewDB

Electrical
Sep 20, 2011
142
Hello,

We produce a power electronic converter that operates at 480V 3ph input. The device is 3 wire only, no neutral connection. For operation on 600V and 690V systems we utilize a 3 PH auto-transformers. The auto-transformer is integrated into the same enclosure, so it falls under our UL listing (not under the customer's wiring local AHJ).

The transformer was selected by my predecessor. It is Y connected, a 3 phase 3 leg unit. The neutral is not connected as the load is solely 3 wire. In fact it is buried and not normally accessible. Had I selected this unit, I would have included a delta tertiary winding to provide a zero sequence / triplen path. I was concerned that we could block ground faults and / or have winding over-voltages on ground faults.

Being curious, I did some testing on the system. First I accessed the buried neutral and measured voltage waveforms. There was not a significant 3rd harmonic present on the neutral as I expected. I also tried 5A and 10A of zero sequence current - again, no significant impedance noted. The voltage only dropped a fraction of a percent.

That's when I realized that DUH, a 3 leg core doesn't act like three single phase units. Un-canceled MMF of one phase couples to other phases and can induce currents to flow in the other phases. My concern though is that this means that there is MMF top-to-bottom on the core. This MMF no doubt could cause heating in adjacent steel of the enclosure.

It makes me wonder if I really should push for a delta winding. I would need to pitch "hey we should make the transformer more expensive" without something very solid to back it up. I'm also not sure how I should size this winding. All of the literature I'm finding is talking about huge utility units for going between transmission system voltages. Here the wye point is solidly or impedance grounded.

I'm thinking for sizing there are two requirements - indefinite up to 10A zero sequence when we're applied on a HRG, and "don't burn off" when coordinated with our input breaker on a maximum fault current source.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

No need for a tertiary winding as the enclosure will act as a virtual tertiary. In case of maximum unbalance loading ie lot of zerosequence currents, you may find a slight heating of enclosure sides facing the windings.
 
You could change to two transformers in an open delta configuration.
The effect that you describe is sometimes called a "Phantom Delta".

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter
 
prc: Wouldn't the enclosure reduce the phantom delta effect? I'm thinking steel in the vicinity of the core will act like a 4th leg and provide an alternate path for the flux. In this case the zero sequence impedance would increase.
 
When zero sequence currents flow in the three phases, the consequent zero sequence flux from the windings(not core) will flow in to the magnetic enclosure,creating eddy currents.These circulating currents in the tank will act as a tertiary winding,bringing down the zero sequence impedance.Flux from the core will overflow out of core only when there is a over fluxing(due to higher v/f ratio)
 
The open delta auto-transformer connection has no need of a neutral, has no phantom delta effect and requires two transformers rather than three transformers. I have used this connection successfully many times.

Bill
--------------------
"Why not the best?"
Jimmy Carter
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor