bklauba
Industrial
- Sep 22, 2003
- 285
In general, the speed of sound c is given by
c = ( C / ? ) exp 1/2
where C is a coefficient of stiffness and ? is the density.
In a solid, this stiffness is expressed as the Young's modulus.
In a solid rod (with thickness much smaller than the wavelength) the speed of sound is given by:
c (solid) = ( E / ? ) exp 1/2
where E is Young's modulus and ? (rho) is density
A not often noted phenomenon is the augmentation of the speed of sound, as a result of the presence of stress. The use of an ultrasonic signal to measure the speed of sound in a torqued bolt as compared with a non-torqued control sample is one area where this concept is applied. See: The timing of shock waves in the earth's crust (seismology) to measure the stress energy in the crust appears to be another example.
Since the density would be only effected marginally (likely undetectably) by the presence of stress, does this not mean that the Young's modulus, normally considered a constant, is the parameter undergoing similar augmentation by the presence of stress? Have I misinterpretted something?
I welcome any comments or guidance. Perhaps there is a better way of stating this.
BK
c = ( C / ? ) exp 1/2
where C is a coefficient of stiffness and ? is the density.
In a solid, this stiffness is expressed as the Young's modulus.
In a solid rod (with thickness much smaller than the wavelength) the speed of sound is given by:
c (solid) = ( E / ? ) exp 1/2
where E is Young's modulus and ? (rho) is density
A not often noted phenomenon is the augmentation of the speed of sound, as a result of the presence of stress. The use of an ultrasonic signal to measure the speed of sound in a torqued bolt as compared with a non-torqued control sample is one area where this concept is applied. See: The timing of shock waves in the earth's crust (seismology) to measure the stress energy in the crust appears to be another example.
Since the density would be only effected marginally (likely undetectably) by the presence of stress, does this not mean that the Young's modulus, normally considered a constant, is the parameter undergoing similar augmentation by the presence of stress? Have I misinterpretted something?
I welcome any comments or guidance. Perhaps there is a better way of stating this.
BK