Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

FloWorks good or bad for CFD

Status
Not open for further replies.

winpop123

Mechanical
May 18, 2006
81
I recently got a FloWorks demo and quote. We are considering adding it to our software suite to aid in our up front engineering for cooling electronic cases. Any input good or bad from folks that are using the software would be appreciated. A few other comments, I'm not an analylist but the go to Mechanical guy at my company. I have alot of past experience doing in depth FEA on various structures as well as modal analysis and random vibration. Since I'm new to CFD I'm plannng on taking a training class first thing assuming we buy it. Will be running the software on an Alienware laptop:
AMD Athlon(tm) 64 X2 Dual Core Processor 4800+
2 Gig RAM
NVIDIA Quadro FX Go1400
about 80 gig free space

Thanks for the help.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

You might get a better response to this in the CFD forum, under Engineerign Methods.

corus
 
Hi,
if you plan to do flow-thermal analyses inside a closed box, then FloWorks is perfectly able to do this and I think it really worths the money. I wouldn't say it's the best choice possible, but competitors are, as far as I know, more expensive.

Regards
 
Thanks for the input. We use SolidWorks and the fact that FloWorks is embedded and there is no data transfer is a BIG selling point for us.
 
I've been using FloWorks for less than a year and if I had a chance to change to another program I would. It has a lot of buggs and clunky work arounds. I would not purchase any analysis program just because it is integrated into a CAD software. None of my CAD models I use for design can be used for FloWorks without major changes to the models. It may be a good program as a stand alone but packaged with Solidworks might have removed some of the good features.
 
Thanks 2design. Could you give me a little more background to go along with your opinion? For example are you an expeirenced CFD user? Is there another program you can recommmend. How are you using the program (ie) whats your product. Thanks again for your help.
 
I've used one other CFD in the past but that was for a different sector that wouldn't be of benefit to you.

I also am using Floworks for electronics packaging.

No I do not have a recommendation. I just think that you should not buy it just because it is packaged with SolidWorks. You will get what you pay for.

Some example of issues:
1) any component that requires conduction require interference (major CAD manipulation).

2) saving the results using the pulldown menu corrupts your results.

3) you have to assume adiabatics walls for internal flow

 
Hi,
for thermal flow analyses: Icepak (a "cousin" of Fluent). But I really don't know if it's integrated with CAD.

There is surely another CFD integrated with SolidWorks, which outperforms FloWorks at least 5 to 1, but it is also much more expensive; right now I can't remember its name, but if you go to SolidWorks' site there is a page where all the partners are listed: you may want to look for "Gold Partners" because only for them SW certifies that they 100% follow SW standards for API, support, etc...

Regards
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor