Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Seismic Load Effects

Status
Not open for further replies.

JD2

Structural
Apr 15, 2003
46
In the Seismic Load Effects equation (ASCE 7-02 eq. 9.5.2.7-1)

E = rho Q(sub E) + .2 S(sub DS) D

From a number crunching standpoint, for a steel frame building (standard AISC double angle connections for typical beam to column connections) with X-bracing located symmetrically around the perimeter of the structure, can the HORIZONTAL component of the Seismic force (rho Q(sub E))generate a vertical load in an interior column which supports only gravity loads and is not part of any of the braced frames?

I would think NO.

All of the examples that I have access to however, calculate a vertical load from the horizontal seismic force but they always utilize moment frames in the example.

Any thoughts would be appreciated.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

JD2,
I'm with you. It shouldn't give you a vertical component if it's not vertically braced. I could be wrong. Wouldn't be the first time.
Chip
 
There is a vertical component that is generated in moment frame columns due to horizontal only loads, whether it is from seismic or wind. For gravity only (pin-pin) columns, the simple (theoretical) answer is that you should not get a vertical force from horizontal only loads.

It is not a code issue but an analysis one.
 
I would agree - the horizontal part of E shouldn't create any vertical reaction in pinned, gravity only connections. But I'm just curious as to why you are asking.

Because you are seeing vertical reactions in the moment frame examples? Not sure why you posted the question.

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor