Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Ferritic contamination of titanium 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

antoine66

Materials
Jun 2, 2008
6
In some specifications, we need to perform a contamination test (ferroxyl test) on titanium stuff before heat treatment.
I would precisely like to know what happens when you throw into a furnace for a stress reliving heat treatment a part of ferritic contaminated titanium.
Is it possible after the heat treatment to detect some contamination if testing or handling was improper before the HT? If yes, by which methods?

 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

You should be following something similar to ASTM A380, "Standard Practice for Cleaning, Descaling and Passivation of Stainless Steel Parts, Equipment and Systems".

Section 7 (Inspection after Cleaning) gives a couple of tests for detection of iron contamination. We have used the Ferroxyl Test very succesfully on titanium alloys. Application of the solution was carried out with a spray bottle. Removing surface iron contamination can either be done by brushing off, washing off or ultimately by grinding out and welding up the hole (if allowed).

We heven't needed to do any stress relief, so I can't tell you what might occur with the test. Try deliberatly contaminating a piece and testing after H/T, and let us know what you find.


 
Yes, we use one of the tests specified in A 380 (which also gives info about copper sulfate test, we also can use phenanthroline test).
My concern is that I heard that once heated, the contaminant parts migrate into the titanium and cannot be detected any more, while hampering the corrosion resistance of the titanium. This may be the reason why some engineering specs (AMOCO, KVAERNER, etc..) are asking the cleaning to be performed before any HT. I would like to find somebody with some feedback about this.
 
Im not an expert on corrosion but, wouldnt the Ferroxyl test also show positive if there is a thermal oxide layer?. This has been confused in the past, with Iron deposits. Or are they one of the same?.....Just throwing it out there chaps!
 
After heat treatment you could see Fe contamination if you pickled the parts. The Fe will for an intermetallic compound with the Ti. This is brittle and has poor corrosion resistance.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
Plymouth Tube
 
About thermal titanium oxide, I do not think Ferroxyl test will react because it is specifically intended to react with iron. If some iron oxide is still present on the titanium surface, we may find it but if it diffuses inside titanium thickness, we may have trouble to detect it.

It is true that we may see Fe contamination when pickling the parts, however, this is not an option for us because we are manufacturing titanium bonded steel plates and the pickling solution will attack the backer steel.

I also read in a paper that iron contamination could favor hydrogen absorption of titanium, which also hampers corrosion resitance. Anybody to comment?
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor