Fachoalto
Civil/Environmental
- Dec 19, 2008
- 6
Hi, gentlemen,
My company is going to set up a big oil refinery in Brazil. The selected site has a total area of 20 km². The plant layout covers roughly 70% of this area. Natural topography has elevations between 15 meters and 50 meters. The company has recently contracted basic and detailed earthwork projects, including drainage. As an input to these projects, my colleagues have defined plateaus, at different levels, with areas ranging from 0.5 km² to 4 km².
My questions are:
Is there any advantage in having horizontal plateaus of so huge dimensions?
Wouldn't it be better if we allowed some declivity (ok, below a specified maximum) for the final grading (i.e., instead of horizontal plateaus, they would have a slight declivity)?
Wouldn't it be better if the final grading followed natural topography (i.e. we would just specify the maximum declivity allowed in the graded surface)?
Thanks in advance for your opinions.
My company is going to set up a big oil refinery in Brazil. The selected site has a total area of 20 km². The plant layout covers roughly 70% of this area. Natural topography has elevations between 15 meters and 50 meters. The company has recently contracted basic and detailed earthwork projects, including drainage. As an input to these projects, my colleagues have defined plateaus, at different levels, with areas ranging from 0.5 km² to 4 km².
My questions are:
Is there any advantage in having horizontal plateaus of so huge dimensions?
Wouldn't it be better if we allowed some declivity (ok, below a specified maximum) for the final grading (i.e., instead of horizontal plateaus, they would have a slight declivity)?
Wouldn't it be better if the final grading followed natural topography (i.e. we would just specify the maximum declivity allowed in the graded surface)?
Thanks in advance for your opinions.