vesterholt
Mechanical
- Sep 12, 2013
- 1
I have always wondered why fan curves don't appear to be consistent with the affinity laws that we are taught. For example. We are taught that:
P2/P1 = (RPM2/RPM1)^2 = (CFM2/CFM1)^2
This would mean that fan curves should be perfect quadratic squares and all look like parabolas. However, we know this is not the case. They are often very flat at low CFM or even have a dip.
For example: [URL unfurl="true"]http://www.fumetech.com.au/images/300perfcurve.gif[/url]
or
or
Does this mean the affinity laws are not correct or are an approximation? What is the explanation for the discrepancy between the curves and the laws? Do the laws not apply under certain conditions? Does this have to do with laminar/turbulent flow?
Thanks!
P2/P1 = (RPM2/RPM1)^2 = (CFM2/CFM1)^2
This would mean that fan curves should be perfect quadratic squares and all look like parabolas. However, we know this is not the case. They are often very flat at low CFM or even have a dip.
For example: [URL unfurl="true"]http://www.fumetech.com.au/images/300perfcurve.gif[/url]
or
or
Does this mean the affinity laws are not correct or are an approximation? What is the explanation for the discrepancy between the curves and the laws? Do the laws not apply under certain conditions? Does this have to do with laminar/turbulent flow?
Thanks!