Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Jamb Studs at Patio Door - To Fix or Not to Fix

Status
Not open for further replies.

KootK

Structural
Oct 16, 2001
18,058
So there's this building with problems... It's getting new windows and patio doors and, in the process of exploring things, it's come to light that the jamb studs are generally woefully deficient. 3.625 26 gauge single studs all over for some pretty large openings.

Anyhow, one of these conditions is a patio door rather than a window. In my mind, this is a better situation than with the windows because, since the doors span from floor to ceiling and can slide, they must be able to span vertically. Therefore the jamb studs are almost redundant from a strength perspective. But, then, if the door and it's frame are designed for, say L/175, is that going to be a problem for the stucco adjacent to the door which would inevitably see some load?

Don't get me wrong, if this were all new construction I'd just beef up the jambs and think on it no more. It's not new construction though. And this decision will be the difference between messing with the envelope in this area and not having to do anything at all. Multiplied over a zillion patios (high rise), that's some real money.

Please advise. For what it's worth, there has has been no evidence of serviceability problems in the past.

c01_agr4ef.jpg


I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Kootk,

What is the span-deflection ratio of a single 16" O.C. stud? Can't be too high if it is 26ga.
I would assume vertically spanning for the whole door so, like you stated, the jamb is redundant.
I think I would document it and maybe put it in a contract with the owner that the existing walls do not meet code and you are not adding any meaningful load to them and take no responsibility for them.
 
I waffled back and forth in my head on whether I'd say it's acceptable or not. Definitely a good question.

I'd suggest talking to the door manufacturer and seeing if you can get someone in engineering/testing at their plant who has a better idea of the limitations and load distribution of the door system.

Ian Riley, PE, SE
Professional Engineer (ME, NH, MA) Structural Engineer (IL)
American Concrete Industries
 
Personally I agree that the door spans vertically. Windows I'm always less confident on that, I tend to treat them as one or two way spanning elements based on aspect ratio.

XR brings up a good point, does a 3 5/8" 26 Ga stud even work at the typical spacing for deflection?
 
jayrod said:
XR brings up a good point, does a 3 5/8" 26 Ga stud even work at the typical spacing for deflection?

shhhhhh... there might be a minor issue with web crippling. I'm not quite ready to be the reason that they have to entirely de-skin three high rises.

Only 8' stud height. Bending and deflection due just barely work at the upper levels.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
I personally feel then that the trib width to the jamb stud likely wouldn't be more than the average middle wall stud since the door spans vertically. As XR indicated, may be worth documenting in some sort of letter but I don't feel as though it's a huge issue for a sliding patio door.

Window on the other hand I feel is a bigger concern. Because I'm willing to bet if the jamb studs are singles, it's entirely likely that the head and sill tracks are single 26 ga track which will be woefully deficient for even a small window.
 
jayrod said:
Because I'm willing to bet if the jamb studs are singles, it's entirely likely that the head and sill tracks are single 26 ga track

That would be some robust betting.

I like to debate structural engineering theory -- a lot. If I challenge you on something, know that I'm doing so because I respect your opinion enough to either change it or adopt it.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor