Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Factor of Safety for a permanently suspended structure

Status
Not open for further replies.

jochav52802

Structural
Nov 28, 2018
80
Hello All,

I'm designing a hanging rectangular frame to support some elevated IMP walls off of an existing manufacturing building. The frame will be composed of channel beams supported vertically by wire-ropes; the wire rope supplier indicated that the ropes should utilize a safety factor of 10 since they are supporting a permanent overhead load, (by comparison, they specify that a safety factor of 5 should be used for temporary rigging applications.)

Additionally, the lateral restraints for the frame will utilize Square HSS sections since they need to resist both tension/compression, (this is because we can only place lateral restraints on one side of the frame in both the North/South & East/West directions due to the building geometry restrictions.) The end-connections for the lateral restraints will be composed of a male/female pinned connection.

With that said, I'd appreciate help with the following questions:

1) 10 seems like a ridiculously over-conservative safety factor to use; by comparison, the AISC 360-16 steel code only requires an ASD safety factor of 1.5/2.0 for tensile yielding/rupture limit states. Is it common practice to use a safety factor of 10 for wire ropes supporting permanent structural assemblies?

2) Since the ropes are designed for a safety factor of 10, should all of the subsequent supporting connections and members also be designed for the same safety factor of 10 regardless of what the steel code requires? It would seem strange to not design all of the supporting elements for the same safety factor, otherwise they would fail long before the ropes ever reached their capacity.

3) What would be an appropriate/standard practice type standard/procedure to follow for designing the pin diameters for the pinned end-connections for the lateral restraints? Would something within the CMAA group be appropriate?

Many thanks for your time/help!
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Table D-3 is shown below:

D-3_lx5dov.png


The safety factor for wire rope is defined as Breaking Strength/Load whereas safety factor for steel shapes is defined as Yield Strength/Load. In the case of A36 steel, Fy = 36,000 psi and ultimate tensile strength, Fu = 58,000 to 80,000 psi, so it is not accurate to compare safety factors directly.

Any structural members other than wire rope should be designed in accordance with the code, not in accordance with wire rope practice.

BA
 
Design the steel wire rope and any things related to the rigging of the cables like shackles, etc for the 10 factor of safety.

Design anything else normally. It's because the cable isn't really ductile and doesn't handle being loaded right to the limit, you want to work in a range where it remains elastic essentially (stress/strain curve is not linear at higher stains), they don't have a defined yield point like a steel rod due to the strain hardening in forming the wire components, just don't make your brittle cable the weakest link.

Regarding point 2, that's the point, cables aren't likely to be the limiting factor if they have a factor of 10 if that's what's being recommended.
 
Thank you BA,

Would you please let me know where the table you referenced came from?

Looks like ASCE 19 is the governing code for cables; I should have thought to look at IBC...thanks for the guidance!

 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor