Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations cowski on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Seismic retrofit using existing KB-II expansion anchors

Status
Not open for further replies.

Sam_Eng

Structural
Feb 25, 2022
3
I am designing a seismic retrofit for a 110,000 square foot tilt-up building that was designed and constructed in 2000-2001 to the 1997 UBC. The building retrofit is to be designed as a risk Category IV building (essential facility) per the current code (2018 IBC) to the extent that it can be. The problem I am currently encountering is that Hilti KB-IIs were used to connect the tilt up walls to steel angle ledgers connected to the metal roof diaphragm and anchor the walls to the roof diaphragm as well. KB-IIs are not approved for use in cracked concrete and all concrete should be assumed to be cracked when in a high seismic zone (seismic design zone D).

I have contacted Hilti and they were not all that helpful, giving me an old catalog section for calculating the allowable load on the anchors, and suggested that I do some in place testing of the anchors. I'm not sure what the testing would accomplish as the concrete is likely not cracked and the anchors will likely test out to the 2x the allowable anchor load.

I can't imagine this is the first time something like this has happened. Does anyone here have any references on using non-complying anchors for current codes?



 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I imagine you have a few options but none are quick. 1)Pay to get the anchors tested for cracked concrete, essentially a whole new ESR. Maybe they test out or not. I see you removing sections of the wall with the anchor for testing unless you can buy more anchors for testing purpose. 2) Provide new approved anchors to meet the seismic design. Now you have double the anchors but only one set is for seismic.
 
CG Hopi, thanks for you thoughts. There are about 1500 of these anchors so I would prefer not to replace them for obvious reasons. You idea of testing the anchors in a cracked condition is something I will look into.
 
The Hilti KB-2 is a wedge anchor. I don't imagine wedge anchors will perform well in cracked concrete but I'm not an expert in that specific issue. Still, testing is probably worthwhile to save 1500 anchors. Please follow up here with any test results!
 
Wedge anchors can be approved for cracked concrete. As noted older anchors typically do not have this testing and if you are doing a retrofit you usually use the new code/standards which require tested anchors.

Screenshot_tzdgwf.png
 
While it would be nice to use the current code for the retrofit, I have told the client that I intended to use the 2018 IBC for all situations where I could but then switch to either the 2018 IEBC or ASCE 41-17 for non-conforming elements. The KB-IIs would seem to fall under that exception. However, neither code seems to adequately address existing anchors. The IEBC mentions existing CIP anchors and discusses analysis or testing of those but is silent on post-installed anchors as is ASCE 41. I find it a somewhat amusing that the IEBC throws up its hands on the testing of CIP anchors and says "Criteria for analysis and testing shall be determined by the building official".

I guess my next step will be to talk to the building official and see what they have to say.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor