Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations GregLocock on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Angled Beam Bearing on Supporting Beam

Status
Not open for further replies.

onlym112

Structural
Sep 9, 2019
45
Hello,

I am currently working on a beam connection where the Engineer of Record has a segment of a W-beam bearing directly on top of another W-beam. Because the supporting beam is in regular configuration, the supported beam is not bearing much on top of the supporting beam. Does anyone have an idea on how to resolve this issue? Initially I was thinking of rotating the supporting beam so that the supported beam can get the full bearing however, I have yet to hear a response from the EOR. I have attached several images for your reference.

Thank you

Roof_fiu4jx.png
Roof2_s3rdte.png
Bearing_weitda.png
Bearing_2_lq6ht3.png


 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I've dropped the supporting beam a few inches and detailed a bent plate that can be welded at each end. If the reaction is high enough, include a gusset aligned with the web above inside the bent plate.

Rotating the supporting beam just creates other issues with the connection of that beam to columns, stability and torsion in the beam, etc.
 
If the girders connect to the sides of the columns rather than running continuously over tops of them, then I think that rotating the beams to suit is a great idea:

1) It would likely be the cheapest solution.

2) I believe that it would induce no torsion in the girders.

3) Surely the columns and diaphragm can handle the tiny bit of lateral thrust that this solution would imply.

Dropping the girder and fabricating some kind of level bearing seat is pretty conventional stuff where the girder can be dropped. That said, whatever form the seat takes, it would need to be done either at every single beam or continuously along the girder. There would be some modest $$$ associated with that.
 
A pretty economical seat might be something like this. Just keep an eye on bolt access and design the WT such that it doesn't flop over laterally. It appears that you have roll beams bracing each beam beam pair so your rollover concerns there should not be significant.

c01_yrp4fy.png
 
I was going to suggest that same sketch which I’ve used before.
 
Hi
An unequal leg angle with the long leg welded to underside of the top flange laid upward may help.
 
The OP's pictures make it look like the angle between the beams might be very slight.... If so, then I wonder if you can "shim" with a couple of slender wedge shims like we might do for wood. I guess that just takes care of the bearing. And, you'd need to drill a hole in a couple of the shim where you'd want your bolts.

I believe these shims are reasonably common for erection of base plates column connections to get them level prior to grouting. I've just never done this for a sloped beam like this.



 
I have used a simple bent plate in this configuration especially when the roof slope angle is large. The connection would be a field weld though.
 
onlym112 said:
If so, then I wonder if you can "shim" with a couple of slender wedge shims like we might do for wood.

I had considered this as well and wonder if one of our steel fabricator guys might be able to render an opinion. If there happens to be some "off the the shelf" shims of just the right pitch, I'd have to think that would be the way to go. If the shims would be custom fabricated, that would be another matter as I'm not sure how cost prohibitive (or not) that would be. Do fab shops just have big automated "shim grinders" tucked away in the corner or something?
 
I feel like we could use a few more sketches here. I assume that this is what we've been talking about with respect to a bent plate solution that the supported beam would need to be welded to.

C01_tj1xxt.png
 
This is a little more awkward mechanically but, if the clip were wider than the beam, you could bolt it down. I don't know that all -- or even any -- of the stiffeners shown are actually required. Their absence would imply the utilization of plate elements in bending however.

C01_rce1jb.png
 

The fabrication company that I work for does not have a standard steel shim nor a machine that is capable of cutting out shim. We could use the plasma table to cut multiple thin shims according to the max plate thickness the plasma table can cut through. I believe some shops may have the machines that are capable of making shims.
 
I have a project that I inherited after the framing layout directions were set. It has joists sitting on shim plates, the below is from the fabrication drawings. They made the shims continuous across the top of the girders on the shops instead of being a single shim under each individual joist.

I would still drop the girder (if possible) and provide the WT supports in the OP case and not mess with shims.

Screenshot_2022-09-09_103513_a811ol.gif
 
Thanks for the feedback on the shims gentlemen.
 
Seems like this is a situation the EOR should have addressed when he/she was designing/detailing the building. You can tell that the EOR is very unfamiliar with construction. I've had similar situations in the past and have gone the seat rout shown in KootK's first redline sketch. I will even fight the architect, if needed, to let me drop the elevation of the girder.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor