Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Concrete breakout in an "infinite" direction 1

Status
Not open for further replies.

YoungGunner

Structural
Sep 8, 2020
98
I notice that Simpson's Anchor Designer software that when you toggle an "infinite" amount of concrete in the direction of the load, they ignore shear concrete breakout in that direction. Hilti's Profis software does not do this. I have seen one thread on here from 2008 where they mention some notes from PCA about this but ACI has nothing on the topic. The specific scenario I'm looking into is a base plate for a steel frame on a foundation wall. I'm asking the following:
1) Would anyone else agree with Simpson that if you have an "infinite" amount of concrete in the direction of the breakout cone that you don't need to worry about breakout in that direction?
2) At what point would you consider that you have an "infinite" amount of concrete to actually utilize that? Simpson will not ignore concrete breakout in that direction with an "extreme" amount of concrete (I tested for 240" in that direction, still considered it) so I'd need a good rule of thumb if I wanted to utilize that feature.
Screenshot_2022-10-17_113551_mwgejx.png
Screenshot_2022-10-17_113622_duknj2.png
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

If your ca.2 and depth aren't infinite, you still need to consider breakout. But if those are large enough then I wouldn't consider breakout.
 
In many applications, you won't be able to push "infinity" too far before you run into pryout failure which, in my opinion, is another version of a shear breakout which is not cured by infinite extent.
 
canwesteng said:
If your ca.2 and depth aren't infinite, you still need to consider breakout. But if those are large enough then I wouldn't consider breakout.

So Simpson will still consider the breakout perpendicular to the load breaking out the side wall, but in the direction of the mass amounts of concrete it ignores it. Are you saying you'd still consider the latter breakout?
 
I'm not familiar with Simpson but have used Hilti's software a lot

I agree with KootK that pryout is broadly unrelated to edge breakout
From memory the calcs actually use the tension capacity of the installation as the basis for a pryout failure, so it's fundamentally distinct from breakout
Checking this in Hilti, setting edge distances to infinity ignores the 'Concrete Edge Breakout' mechanism but still calculates the 'Pryout' mechanism as expected

Looking at ETA TR029 which is the basis for Hilti's calcs:
"Concrete edge failure need not to be verified for groups with not more than 4 anchors when the edge distance in all directions is c > 10 hef and c > 60d"
where c = edge distance in any particular direction
d = fixing diameter
hef = effective depth of embedment

In practice, I'm usually a bit more lenient than this if I'm fixing into a reinforced concrete block
Rational review will usually show that, if you're 500mm from an edge or whatever, your load should be able to be developed into your slab reo
Obviously that is case-by-case dependent, but practical application usually limits the shear load to 20kN or so, so even basic slab mesh will pick this up in development quite quickly
If I deem that this is the case I may set edge distance to infinity rather than get too picky trying to work out exactly what my edge distances are


 
Have you tried to verify the limit states by hand? I know that there is a lot of things going on with anchorage calculations these days, but if the load and geom are known it isn't that had to bust through the calcs by hand. I feel that inspection of the calculations involved here can give you the answer that you seek.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor