It would be nice if we had a standard terminology. I have always considered "engineered fill" to be just that, a fill designed to serve a specific purpose on the project. It can be aggregate base for placing beneath pavement, it can be compacted clay for the core of an earth fill dam, it can be a clean "drain rock" for bedding of buried utility lines. However, I have seen many project specifications that define engineered fill as what I consider aggregate base. Then, when I mention the "engineered fill" being placed to grade a pad, everybody thinks I've lost my mind. They think I'm requesting a massive import of aggregate, when the onsite soils are great and should be utilized.
ASTM D698 is titled "Standard Test Methods for Laboratory Compaction Characteristics of Soil Using Standard Effort", but includes a method for material that has up to 30% particles over 19 mm(3/4 inch). By this, I would think it can all be called soil, but it must be clearly defined.