Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

Register Log in
  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Welding Sockolets in 304

Status
Not open for further replies.
Stefan2211

Stefan2211

Chemical
Jun 25, 2020
104
Dear All,

our contractor looks for a common way how to weld a 3/4" pipe (304) into a 3/4 "sockolet (304). The gap between sockolet and inserted pipe is to small (~0.1mm) to purge the oxygen completely with forming gas. There will be a risk of crevice corrosion. The pipe (3") uses many sockolets so it is not possiple to purge from the 3" pipe due to all the holes of the sockolets. It is very time consuming.
Any practical solution like drilling a small hole on the side of the sockolet to easier purge?
I guess there is a common used way to do it.
Thanks
IMG_20231207_082224_ysggom.jpg
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Sort by date Sort by votes
Socket weld for SS is a very incorrect design. Use butt weld.

Regards
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
r6155. Yes I agree but now we have to find a solution. Thanks for your input.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
How do you ensure that the hole is completely filled with weld at the end of welding the pipe?.
Try plastic wrap to cover all the holes.

Regards
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Yes it could be done but very time consuming.Weldolet would have been the right choice. But the project is in Czech and will be done for US so it is difficult to get ASME fittings from stock.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
There is absolutely no reason to purge a socket weld, even if it is stainless steel. You are only wasting purge gas doing this.

The practical solution is to stop purging all together.

The devil is in the details; she also wears prada.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Why is that DVWE. I am neither a welding engineer nor a welder. Thanks
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Because of the inability to get an adequate purge; just like the problem you’re having.

The devil is in the details; she also wears prada.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
I agree with DVWE, but my reason is different.
If socket welding is a wrong design (as I said before) why use a backup gas that is for a good design (butt welding)?
Has no sense.

Regards
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
You use inflatable bladders on the inside to isolate the area being worked on for purge.
And the correct gas is pure Ar.
You will end up with crevice corrosion.
You need to make sure that the pipe does not bottom out in the socket.
There is a required gap after welding.

= = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = =
P.E. Metallurgy, consulting work welcomed
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Ed said:
You will end up with crevice corrosion.
Click to expand...

If there is concern of crevice corrosion, then a socket welded joint is a poor choice, as indicated by r6155. By design, socket welds always have crevice.

Ed said:
There is a required gap after welding.
Click to expand...

That depends on the customer requirements. Most codes state that the gap has to be present prior to welding only. Recently, B31.3 went as far as stating directly that gap is not required to be present or verified after welding. I’ve seen the “after welding” requirement in some customer specifications.

The devil is in the details; she also wears prada.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Socket wels fittings are for externally corrosive environment. An appropriate example for SS socket weld is hydraulic fluid in piping exposed to fresh water.

An import requirement for socket weld is that the pipe MUST NOT bottom out in the fitting. Leave a 1/16th inch gap. This is difficult to control in the field. Welding without a gap leaves residual stress in the weld which will cause it to crack if it is exposed to cyclic stresses.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
@ TugboatEng

"Socket welds fittings are for externally corrosive environment": WHAT??

"This is difficult to control in the field" - it's the same as butt welding, with RT

".....if exposed to cyclic stresses.": socket weld is not permitted for cyclic service.

Regards
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
r6155 said:
"Socket welds fittings are for externally corrosive environment": WHAT??
Click to expand...

I agree with what Tug wrote. The key word is “externally” [wink]

The devil is in the details; she also wears prada.
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Weld-o-let, sock-o-let, and thread-o-let are trade names. They are not list as suck by ASME pressure piping codes. However, if one looks at the provisions for "socket welds" or "socket fittings", one should find the limitations and requirements in the applicable ASME pressure piping code, B31.1, B31.3, B31.9, etc.

Best regards - Al
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
See ASME B16.11, mentioned in ASME B31.3
Weld-o-let, sock-o-let ... are included as "socket fittings"

Regards
 
Upvote 0 Downvote
Status
Not open for further replies.

Similar threads

John Jones
  • Question
WPS/WPQR 304/316
Replies
1
Views
880
kingnero
kingnero
capntom62
  • Locked
  • Question
Finishing a 304 SS welded assembly
Replies
17
Views
294
EdStainless
EdStainless
mrmalcolm
  • Question
Range of filler material for welding procedures qualification in ISO 15614-1
Replies
1
Views
928
weldstan
weldstan
capntom62
  • Locked
  • Question
N95 masks for welding ?
Replies
5
Views
626
TugboatEng
TugboatEng
penpe
  • Locked
  • Question
welding in 1958
Replies
8
Views
120
dik
dik

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top Bottom