Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

New Masonry to Existing Multi-wythe Brick Masonry Connection

Status
Not open for further replies.

ChiEngr

Structural
Oct 19, 2021
69
Hello,

I am wondering if anybody sees an issue with a detail I am working on currently. I have a condition where the client wants to raise, locally, the height of a parapet several feet to match the height of an adjacent parapet wall constructed out of 3-wythes of brick (The existing building is approximately 100 years old). I am designing the parapet extension, consisting of 4" face brick + 8" CMU backup, to span horizontally (approximately 6 foot span between adjacent wall piers). For reasons I won't get into in this post, I want there to be in-plane slip at the joint between the new parapet extension and the existing parapet. Thus, I am only trying to achieve out-of-plane shear transfer. My initial thought is to use a smooth dowel bar between the two materials, with one end greased as well. The shear required to be transferred per dowel is about 400 lbs.

Has anybody encountered something similar in the past? I am not sure what capacity checks I should even be considering outside of dowel strength and bearing against the existing brick masonry. Any help or suggestions would be greatly appreciated.
Smooth_Dowel_htjef6.png
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

I'd move the dowel to midpoint of the 8" CMU... smooth is OK, but would likely use 3/4" or 1" dia dwls. I'd likely use a 3/4"x1" deep joint between the CMU and the existing brick. Use ethafoam and caulk. I'd put a L 3x3x20 gauge flashing in the joint between the existing brick and the front face of the CMU wall, caulked and secured with screws to the existing brick. I'd leave a joint between the new face brick and existing brick filled with ethafoam and caulked. Use proper insulation, air gap, and rain screen wall construction for the new face brick.

-----*****-----
So strange to see the singularity approaching while the entire planet is rapidly turning into a hellscape. -John Coates

-Dik
 
That works. I'd specify what lubricant to use, because it serves a structural function. I'd use epoxy on the existing brick side to alleviate concerns of cracking under movement. The CMU side would be the one that's greased.

If you're butting them against each other but don't want to transfer in-plane shear of the CMU wall, I'd also consider adding an expansion joint. It's a minor thing, though.
 

I'd reconsidering anchorage, depending on the loading requirements... the reason for not using 1/2dia dowels or something of that ilk. Reconsidered... if greased on the other end, it doesn't matter if epoxy is used... there will be no [tensile (edit)] load on it. Epoxy is optional.

-----*****-----
So strange to see the singularity approaching while the entire planet is rapidly turning into a hellscape. -John Coates

-Dik
 
There is still an out-of-plane load on it, for which I trust epoxy more than simple bearing.
 
Sure... epoxy or grout... maybe epoxy is easier.

-----*****-----
So strange to see the singularity approaching while the entire planet is rapidly turning into a hellscape. -John Coates

-Dik
 
Thanks for the discussion guys.

I am adding an expansion joint but didn't include that information in my initial sketch.

I was planning on specifying existing brick side as the greased side and relying on bearing of the dowel for the transfer of my out-of-plane load. I guess I agree more with dik in that it shouldn't technically matter...unless I am missing something here.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor