Justice100
Chemical
- Jun 18, 2008
- 42
Hi,
We are in a position where we are about to install a pressure control valve but new requirements have come in for a much lower turndown so the intention is to install a small control valve in parallel to provide the turndown. There needs to be controllability all the way from the normal flow rate to the turndown rate. I have looked through the Liptak Instrument Engineers Handbook Vol 2, which explains some different control techniques for this. The 1st technique uses the small valve at the low range and then switches to the large valve once outside the small valve range; only one valve is to be open at a time so there is a switch point where it closes and the other opens and vice versa. Sizing the small valve seems straight forward.
The other technique is "floating" where the big valve provides coarse control and the small valve provides fine control. It seems this technique has a slower response but to me seems a better way of doing it as there is no switching point. Also, I am not sure how to size the small valve for this technique - does anyone have a good reference for this? Also, any experience or learning on these techniques would be appreciated.
We are in a position where we are about to install a pressure control valve but new requirements have come in for a much lower turndown so the intention is to install a small control valve in parallel to provide the turndown. There needs to be controllability all the way from the normal flow rate to the turndown rate. I have looked through the Liptak Instrument Engineers Handbook Vol 2, which explains some different control techniques for this. The 1st technique uses the small valve at the low range and then switches to the large valve once outside the small valve range; only one valve is to be open at a time so there is a switch point where it closes and the other opens and vice versa. Sizing the small valve seems straight forward.
The other technique is "floating" where the big valve provides coarse control and the small valve provides fine control. It seems this technique has a slower response but to me seems a better way of doing it as there is no switching point. Also, I am not sure how to size the small valve for this technique - does anyone have a good reference for this? Also, any experience or learning on these techniques would be appreciated.