countryham
Chemical
I have developed a new,greatly improved method of catalytically scavenging oxygen with sulfites from boiler feedwaters-- almost instaneously (with a 4+ times greater catalytic result than ever possible in the past with any other (commonly accepted catalyst)technology)----CONTROLLED within 1-2ppb dissolved oxygen prior to the economizer influent.........I know that: (1)this has Flow Accelerated Corrosion Benefits by controlling disolved oxygen in the 4ppb (+-)1-2ppb range. I know that the sulfite usage will be reduced up to 90+ percent (which is pretty insignificant given the low cost of sulfite,HOWEVER, I have received good input from peers who suggested that due to the kinetic improvement,gained within deaerators,that the deaerator storage section's size could be reduced, thereby affecting a sizable reduction in fabrication costs........By,In effect, viewing the deaerator as an in-line reactor...........My question is:...How are deaerator storage sections historically sized??? How much validity could could be attributed to the earlier responder who suggested a size reduction ???How much?? Additionally,-- Can anyone else think of any other undiscovered benefit that can be realized with this technology??.. You are invited to reply, in full lengthy detail,directly to me at john11933@sbcglobal.net if you want..Thanks, in advance, for your help.. Countryham
