Recent content by Jeldon

Hello friends, I need help. We have 2 Flares designed according to ASME SECTION VIII Division 1, searching the literature and according to code API STD 537, they do not need to be hydrostatically or pneumatically tested. I'm talking about the Riser (the equipment and not the pipe that connects...

Dear friends, What is your understanding of the acceptance criteria in the visual welding inspection when an individual pore is found isolated on the surface of the weld with dimension 3.0mm in a circumferential joint with 15.9 mm thickness and 18 "diam. Is approved or rejected? Thanks

Dear SJones, Thank you so much again. You have been helping me a lot.

Dear SJones, You're very sure. I did a mess. Pardon. But, a WPS tested without ECA for pipeline A can be used to weld pipeline B with ECA as long as all the essential variables are met? Thanks again.

Dear friends, Is there any literature such as Code Cases ASME or book interpretations to learn about DNV? Best regards

So a WPS tested without ECA for pipeline A can be used to weld pipeline B with ECA as long as all the essential variables are met? Thanks again.

Yes, I found these terms in WPS made for welding by DNV-OS-F101. Once again, thank you very much for your help.

What do these 5Ga and 5Gd welding positions mean? Specifically the letters a and d Thank you

Hi friends! Are there essential welding variables for WPS when ECA is required? Can a qualified WPS with the ECA requirement be used for welding a joint without this ECA requirement? Thanks

Apologies. Thanks

What is the diameter range qualified for a 24 "pipeline by DNV-OS-F101 Ed. 2013?

What would be the highest PWHT temperature for the P-Number 1 according to TABLE UCS-56 of ASME SECTION VIII Div. 1 Kind regards

DD, Thanks for your answer. My understanding is the same as yours. Best regards, Jeldon

What qualified thickness range for a welder, described by the standard API STD 1104, using a test coupon with 9.5 mm wall thickness, combination processes where the thickness of the deposit was 3.0 mm in GTAW process, and 6.5 mm in the SMAW process.

Qualification of WPS by Section 4, with different thicknesses 1/2'' x 2'', which will be the qualified range?