Recent content by JeniaL

Nice tooling. The reason is MRBs. Bushings installed from the wrong side. Rivets Mfg. head on the wrong side. The reason is a shop floor. Where I work we are a M&P Engineers, so I have to deal with all the shop floor mistakes. Regards, Jenia Ladkov

I have started to use this method but there is one disadvantage. You cannot make an exploded view. All the fasteners/hardware are just geometrical representations. This can be perfect for product design engineering but not for manufacturing engineers. Regards, Jenia Ladkov

Hello guys. How do you deal with a hardware? I mean in an assembly workbench do you insert and position all the fasteners using publications or create a phantom part where all the fasteners positioned using axis to axis method? Regards, Jenia Ladkov

So basically they couldn't give me clear answer why they use two level revision. Some of the engineering documentation came from another manufacturer and another projects and no longer manufactured by previous manufacturer. So basically if current manufacturer has some minor changes they prefer...

I'll get reminder sent to them tomorrow. Regards, Jenia Ladkov

Try to record a macro to see if such function exposed for automation. Regards, Jenia Ladkov

It's not a typo. I have several documents like this. Well I have to ask our customer what does it mean. Regards, Jenia Ladkov

Good day all. Can someone please explain what does this revision mean --A. All engineering documentation in rev.A. I don't understand where is -- comes from. Can't find any explanations over the web. Regards, Jenia Ladkov

So use translate (axis to axis) Regards, Jenia Ladkov

Assembly features are also will be active in part design. In such case in part design I use wire frame representation of holes geometry and I use annotations to describe what and at what stage to drill. You can also add dummy part at assembly level with holes geometry. Regards, Jenia Ladkov

Useful for raw material order during design stage (especially for complex parts) can be also used during price quoting. Regards, Jenia Ladkov

Sir could you please post code as requested above. Regards, Jenia Ladkov

I used Cimatron in the past for design (generally tools for composites). In general modelling Cimatron behaves not bad at all. Within new version they have synchronous modelling tools (I want them in Catia [dazed]). Regarding spring-back compensation we don't have a license for that, but I used...

We use Cimatron for complex parts unfolding. I believe it's FTI. FTI has really nice tools inside Cimatron. Regarding drafting in Cimatron, well it's OK. I haven't worked with Cimatron for a while. You said you want to develop. Is it only design or also manufacturing? Regards, Jenia Ladkov

Ferdo sometimes boolean operation doesn't give desired result especially with curved surface. Regards, Jenia Ladkov