Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by Lee Saxon

  1. Lee Saxon

    Y14.5 1994 5.11.1.6 Holes of Different Sizes. Deprecated in 2018?

    Thanks y'all! 10.5.3.4 & Fig 10-52 were exactly what I was looking for!
  2. Lee Saxon

    Y14.5 1994 5.11.1.6 Holes of Different Sizes. Deprecated in 2018?

    Y14.5 1994 5.11.1.6 Holes of Different Sizes states that you can create a FRTZF / Composite Tolerance for features of different sizes (ie ones where you can't simply use one callout with a '2x') by drawing the FCF (plus a notation such as "TWO FEATURES") separately from any size dimensions, and...
  3. Lee Saxon

    Perpendicularity of an Imaginary Line

    Good idea, I've added a PDF of a simple example.
  4. Lee Saxon

    Perpendicularity of an Imaginary Line

    This seems like a pretty straightforward design case if you're trying to orient but not necessarily locate two parts, but it's not something I've ever found a great example for. I've got two holes. An imaginary line drawn between their centers would need to be *oriented* perpendicular to a flat...
  5. Lee Saxon

    Stackup calculations (X min / X max.)

    I mean, what's the definition of "perfect form" here? If the hole tolerance tells me that it applies only when a Ø19+0.5/-0 shaft is at LMC (and therefore "perfect form"), shouldn't that mean only when you've got a perfectly straight Ø19 shaft in which the upper limit doesn't come into play?
  6. Lee Saxon

    Stackup calculations (X min / X max.)

    I'm confused about how we're getting 18.5 from "19 +0.5/-0"?

Part and Inventory Search