Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations pierreick on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Recent content by RadiateurFou

  1. RadiateurFou

    'Set-in vs set-on' strikes back!

    Dye penetrant, radio or ultrasound
  2. RadiateurFou

    'Set-in vs set-on' strikes back!

    using UW16 with UG41 probably
  3. RadiateurFou

    'Set-in vs set-on' strikes back!

    non destructive examination?
  4. RadiateurFou

    'Set-in vs set-on' strikes back!

    I don't think sif calculation implies NDE, does it?
  5. RadiateurFou

    'Set-in vs set-on' strikes back!

    In table 1.1, 2.3, if you look at the schema there is a radius r2 for the insert nozzle. Under it there is a direct reference to note 8, which is not the case for the set-in nozzle. That's why i though this note was only for insert nozzle, but i think you're right it is more general than that...
  6. RadiateurFou

    'Set-in vs set-on' strikes back!

    You can have a look at note (8) of B31J. Looks like from the first sentence that insert are better for SIF, since you automatically multiply them by 0.7.
  7. RadiateurFou

    Foundation loads of Vertical Vessel/HEx Lugs on Supporting Structure

    I'm not familiar with designing foundation, but if you consider that the lug are pinned to the ground, then you consider that moments wont be transfered at all to the foundation and will only be sustained by the beams/lugs. In this configuration i don't see why you should design foundation to...
  8. RadiateurFou

    Foundation loads of Vertical Vessel/HEx Lugs on Supporting Structure

    Probably just an overall moment calculated by multiplying reaction force by distance from COG
  9. RadiateurFou

    ASME VIII-1 welding for internal projection nozzle on standard blind flange

    Kinda curious too on how you designed the weld. The throat thickness should be 9.45mm (0.7*pipe thickness). So how did you get 8mm?
  10. RadiateurFou

    Things are getting better, or at least not changing, part 1

    I guess that's the main question politicians need to answer
  11. RadiateurFou

    Things are getting better, or at least not changing, part 1

    It depends on the scale of the problem. If the problem is not a big deal, then yes the question is first an economic one, to avoid going to far in the solution. But when the scale of a problem gets big enough, there is a threshold where the economic cost goes second behind actually finding a...
  12. RadiateurFou

    Things are getting better, or at least not changing, part 1

    Denying a full study in one sentence is a bold moove. No i'm not saying that
  13. RadiateurFou

    Things are getting better, or at least not changing, part 1

    I know nothing about plants, i'll assume your right. So climate change casualties will be mitigated by this fact? If so it is a good thing to know This is even worse, as this "attempt" isn't even intentionnal . So the consequences are completly unknowned. It is indeed better for current...
  14. RadiateurFou

    Things are getting better, or at least not changing, part 1

    Like when they starts dying during summer My point exactly. And mass release of CO2 by humans is probably the biggest attemp we've ever done. Indeed because the consequence is not just global warming, but climate change in general. Experts cannot predict the future so it is indeed not an...
  15. RadiateurFou

    Things are getting better, or at least not changing, part 1

    Not talking about mass extinction, just mass calsualties

Part and Inventory Search