Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations IDS on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: londonkid
  • Order by date
  1. londonkid

    large baseplate crossing joint

    2m is slab thickness, piles around 15-20m.
  2. londonkid

    large baseplate crossing joint

    piled, both piled. new will be approx 2m deep
  3. londonkid

    large baseplate crossing joint

    only problem is that it is 2.9m thick slab. so do able but not easy.
  4. londonkid

    why reduce pile capacity in existimg piles

    new will be bored utilising end bearing and friction. I propose to dowel into existing but maintain 3d
  5. londonkid

    large baseplate crossing joint

    HI, I have a situation where there is an existing piled foundation. A large baseplate (part of frame of a rectangular steel tank) will sit on a new found adjacent. However due to constraints part of the base will have to sit over the existing found. Therefore the 'baseplate' will sit over the...
  6. londonkid

    why reduce pile capacity in existimg piles

    ok, logic ok. But if the load transfers back to the old pile then once the new pile settles (slightly) then should the old pile settle - load back to new. System in equiqulibrium. Old pile will have more load but below design load. This is how a newly installed system behaves.
  7. londonkid

    why reduce pile capacity in existimg piles

    I have a scheme where we are installing new pile close to existing, it has been suggested to me I should be reducing the capacity of the existing. Why? If we are far enough away and block failure of the pile group is not critical why does it matter? Why is that any different to them being...
  8. londonkid

    Thermal cracking of reinforced concrete

    there is a new CIRIA guide to this - Ciria 660. Superceeds the previous ciria report and the guidance given in BS8007. Is applicable to eurocodes also. Deals with early age cracking (internal and external restraint) and also long term shrinkage.
  9. londonkid

    portal one side braced other

    hi how do you determine the effective stiffness in ordor to calculate how horizontal load is shared if in a structure you have portal on one side and braced frame the other (in the same plane obviously)
  10. londonkid

    Tower mast fatigue failure of anchor bolts

    agreed fatigue in US is fatigue anywhere. the word 'potential' is key here. we could end up doing expensive remedials that are not needed. at the moment no one seems able to prove or disprove either way.
  11. londonkid

    Tower mast fatigue failure of anchor bolts

    sorry should have said this is UK based. so how would you prove the bolts have fatiged have fatigue cracks forming or have ever been stressed over the design stress (i realise this is slightly different to fatigue).
  12. londonkid

    Tower mast fatigue failure of anchor bolts

    cvg, we do not have any data that you mentioned. Anything we come up with will be based on a lot of assumptions. We are acting as a consultant to a third party. There were apparently some violent movements of the mast during and just after constuction (due to sections since removed). These...
  13. londonkid

    Tower mast fatigue failure of anchor bolts

    Hi,we have a case where concerns have been raised about some anchor bolt installations (tower mast). It is believed that there may be a fatigue problem with the bolts under high tension loads from wind. What are the best ways to prove/disprove this. Also what are others experience regarding this...

Part and Inventory Search