Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. liming37

    An employed engineer and his non-consulting employer are sued.

    A steel structure collapses. What is the difference between aware and not aware of the problem?
  2. liming37

    An employed engineer and his non-consulting employer are sued.

    insurance coverage is Commercial General Liability, not Professional Errors and Omissions. The legal action alleging is professional negligence.
  3. liming37

    An employed engineer and his non-consulting employer are sued.

    My lawyer told me that if his insurance is enough to cover the claim, why need you to pay. But he can't guarantee.
  4. liming37

    An employed engineer and his non-consulting employer are sued.

    I received the claim note 2 weeks ago with my name and ex-employer's name. I have no idea what's going on.
  5. liming37

    An employed engineer and his non-consulting employer are sued.

    An employed engineer and his non-consulting employer are sued in Canada. If the employer's insurance covers the claim, does the employee need to pay the claim?
  6. liming37

    employed engineer is sued by the client

    Thanks for all your comments. It is true anyone can sue anyone. In reality, does anyone know someone (your colleague or friend) who was sued by his employer's insurance company?
  7. liming37

    employed engineer is sued by the client

    An employed engineer and his employer are sued by the client for his negligence in Canada. After the case ends, is it possible for the employer's insurance company to sue the engineer?
Back
Top