3DDave,
That makes a lot of sense. Thanks for clarifying!
I always thought you could only refer to dimensions within the same view. i.e. using "4X" in the bottom left view is incorrect because there are only 2 holes in that view. But it sounds like that's not the case. What is the rule for...
3DDave,
Ah, so you're saying if I left the axes off the holes in the top and right view, then there would be less confusion. I always assumed it was standard to mark holes with an axis. I don't think it creates some sort of new requirement, does it?
Right, but given the coaxial holes are part...
SeasonLee,
I was under the impression that I wasn't making a coaxial feature callout based on the two reasons I listed. Mainly that the TP applies to the "2X Ø.092±.005" dimension, which are holes 1 and 3. In order for it to be a coaxial callout, the coaxial diameters would need to be in the...
First: I gave the holes numbers so we can reference them (thanks for the idea SeaonLee).
SeasonLee,
My intent was having holes 1 and 3 as datum feature A. I can see how one could interpret the drawing as you have shown, using holes 1 and 2 as the datum. I would argue the later interpretation...
Hello All,
I'm new to the forums and have been slowly learning GD&T on the job.
I've attached a simplified example of the part I'm working on. (PLEASE NOTE this is just an example so the part is not fully defined but I think it should serve its purpose for the discussion)
The part is sheet...
