There is definitely a setting, because all was working and then one day the symbols being placed on views were not normal to the screen. Itis as though a CATSetting or something corrupted. Just trying to find in Options, but having no luck.
When placing a 2d components from a catalog into a CATDrawing view, it uses the orientation of the view. How do I get Catia to place the objects normal to the screen...zero rotation? Is there a CATSetting for this?
Only happens to dimensions that are generated from the model. If I create a dimension manually and add a tolerance, it can be moved with no issues.
We have a company standard that was based off of the ASME standard. This standard has been copied and used for many years with no issues.
I agree...
I generate dimensions on drawing views from the model sketch dimensions. I then add a tolerance and all looks good. However, when I move the dimension, the tolerance automatically changes to ±.000? has anyone seen this before or know what could be causing it?
We were previously using R23...
I recently was upgraded to Catia V5-V6 R2022. When I use the Catalog function to add 2d symbols, the browser window is very large and the fon't size is very small. I can increase the font size once the window is opened, but it reverts back each time it is opened. The window size is an issue...
My drawing has a few threaded holes, but many other holes within the part are not threaded and where simply created with the pocket feature. All the drawing views that look parallel to the holes, show them has a threaded feature...center mark with a hidden line circle. If I uncheck the...
If the basic edge dimension went to the center of the holes instead of the edge and datum B was the surface of the radius (Not center axis), would it be ok?
I am no GD&T expert, but I can't believe this is correct (See attached). It seems to me that this allows for the hole to float? I've always been under the impression that the feature had to have an absolute position.
If this is not valid, any feedback helping to explain how it is invalid would...
