Tek-Tips is the largest IT community on the Internet today!

Members share and learn making Tek-Tips Forums the best source of peer-reviewed technical information on the Internet!

Register Log in
  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. winburg22

    Diagonal reinforcement in coupling beams

    Thanks bobby So page 23 says: The longitudinal reinforcement, typically No. 4 or No. 5 bars, should extend only a short distance into the wall boundary so that it will not develop significant tensile stress due to beam flexure. So what's the purpose of the longitudinal reinforcement?
  2. winburg22

    Diagonal reinforcement in coupling beams

    Hi, Can someone please help me understand why the longitudinal reinforcement (reinforcement running left-to-right) for coupling beams with diagonal reinforcement isn't embedded/developed into the walls much at all? Please see image below...
  3. winburg22

    AS3600-2018, CL14.5.4 and 'closed fitments'

    Hi rapt, thanks for your prompt response. in summary, do you think we can use the open C ligs or do we need to have it fully closed? if it's the latter, can we use 2x C-ligs to close the loop? sorry for the additional questions, i'm still confused. regards, winston
  4. winburg22

    AS3600-2018, CL14.5.4 and 'closed fitments'

    I'm having a similar debate with my colleagues. I have 65MPa core walls, so I'm being referred to 14.5.4. But the same clause refers to both 'ties' and fitments'. I don't understand if I'm allowed to use open (C-shape) ligs or not? I really don't want to show fully closed (O-shaped) ligs...

Part and Inventory Search

Back
Top