Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: Nir_k
  • Order by date
  1. Nir_k

    Why don't chips curl when the cutting process is simulated using the CEL method?

    Hello everyone, I am doing a simulation of orthogonal metal cutting process using CEL method. To make sure the simulation is better, I found a very good SCI paper for reference, but unfortunately I didn't reproduce the perfect chip simulation in the author's paper, the picture below shows the...
  2. Nir_k

    ALE method for 2D metal cutting simulation in Abaqus/Explicit?

    Adil Memet, thanks a lot, my dear friend.
  3. Nir_k

    ALE method for 2D metal cutting simulation in Abaqus/Explicit?

    FEA way, thanks so much! You have helped me so many times.
  4. Nir_k

    ALE method for 2D metal cutting simulation in Abaqus/Explicit?

    IceBreakerSours, thanks! Maybe you're right. It might be necessary to use a subroutine.
  5. Nir_k

    ALE method for 2D metal cutting simulation in Abaqus/Explicit?

    FEA way, My dear friend. Thank you very much for your answer. I read a lot of literature that the ALE method doesn't need to specify the chip separation criteria, so I didn't set up the damage model and turned off the element deletion. I saw that there is a blogger on YouTube...
  6. Nir_k

    ALE method for 2D metal cutting simulation in Abaqus/Explicit?

    Hi everyone, I've recently been using Abaqus/Explicit to do a finite element simulation of 2D metal cutting using the ALE method, and I've seen a blogger on YouTube do a similar simulation(https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6wVFSw94Rkk). Still, his results are much more normal than mine. Doesn't...
  7. Nir_k

    Johnson-Cook damage model ?

    FEA way, Thank you for your answer, but what is the definition of "failure"? Is it "Damage initiation" and later, or is it the final "Fracture"?
  8. Nir_k

    Johnson-Cook damage model ?

    Hi, everyone. I want to ask a question about the JC damage model that has been bothering me for a while now, and I feel that it might turn my previous knowledge upside down. Is the strain value calculated by the Johnson-Cook damage model used in Abaqus software the fracture strain? Or is it the...
  9. Nir_k

    Serious error report of mesh distortion!

    Hello, everyone. I carried out the finite element simulation of the metal cutting process in Abaqus/Explicit, but there was a serious error report in the mesh distortion, and the simulation was aborted. Later, I reduced the mesh size by half, and the failure displacement was also reduced, but...
  10. Nir_k

    Abaqus2022 cannot call logical processor

    Dear FEA way, Thanks. I will have a try as you said.
  11. Nir_k

    Abaqus2022 cannot call logical processor

    Hi, FEA way, My operating system is win10, and I do the Abaqus/explicit simulation. I have searched the "newest hotfix for Abaqus2022" just now, but it seemed there was no suitable fix for Abaqus2022 yet[sad].
  12. Nir_k

    Abaqus2022 cannot call logical processor

    Hi all, My computer has 2 cores(4 logical processors), and I set the number of multiple processors in Abaqus is 4. I submitted the job in Abaqus2021, and it ran well, but it was aborted and prompted the errors as I submitted the job in Abaqus2022. The error was "The number of cups (4) exceeds...
  13. Nir_k

    Kinematic contact & Penalty contact

    Hi, FEA way and g.alshamsi, Thanks for your help. And I have run the cutting simulation under two situations; It seemed that contact type(Kinematic contact & Penalty contact) do not affect the result.
  14. Nir_k

    Kinematic contact & Penalty contact

    Hi all, I'm running a metal cutting simulation with Abaqus/explicit. Generally, I use the Kinematic contact between the tool surface and workpiece surface(node-set), but when I set the rigid tool to rotate, it suggests that I can't use kinematic contact anymore, I have to use penalty contact. I...
  15. Nir_k

    5% rule between Kinetic energy and internal energy

    Dear FEA way and g.alshamsi, Please accept my heartfelt thanks. I will modify my simulation model furtherly as per your suggestion.
  16. Nir_k

    5% rule between Kinetic energy and internal energy

    Dear FEA way, I appreciate your patient answer. I have tried so many times, including the below parameters setting. but the result shows that The layer of mesh where the workpiece constraint surface(coupled with RP) is located disappears, and the workpiece rotates only at a small angle. I...
  17. Nir_k

    5% rule between Kinetic energy and internal energy

    Dear FEA way, Thank you so much. The .inp file is too big to upload(over 20Mb), so I have to make it into a zip file. https://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=9d41436e-df34-4e1e-b800-8ca07dc6d8a8&file=Kr_80_cir_2-65.rar
  18. Nir_k

    5% rule between Kinetic energy and internal energy

    Dear FEA way, the following picture shows ALLKE vs ALLIE, and I have restricted energy output to the workpiece, but it obviously doesn't meet the 5% requirement. The mass scaling factor is 100, and it takes me about 5 hours[sadeyes].
  19. Nir_k

    5% rule between Kinetic energy and internal energy

    Hi FEA way, thanks for your answer, the boundary condition I set for my circular tube workpiece is the angular velocity, which is 628 radius/s(100 cycles/s), and the velocity of my tool is 200 mm/s. The step time is 0.02s; I feel the angular velocity in simulation isn't high-speed compared to...

Part and Inventory Search