Have been struggling for months to get a quote for a number of Greylock "compact flanges" for a high pressure duplex line in 20NB and 40NB. I'm making this post to see if anyone knows of a supplier anywhere in the world that can provide similar flanges to suit the below;
Max design pressure...
Does anyone know of a pressure vessel designer and fabricator that could coil 40NB SCH160 S31803 pipe to ~Ø500?
(And delivery to New Zealand)
Also looking for general advice on whether or not such a tight coil on that pipe size is even possible.
Yes, hence my post.
Since posting I re-read my notes. Am I right in thinking that UG-44 prohibits the use of any pipe fittings that are not among the listed ASME standards?
Is it acceptable to use either an RJT hygienic union or a hygienic ferrule on the nozzle of a ASME VIII vessel whose connecting pipe work consists of the same unions/ferrules?
If no, why? And if yes, what requirements must they meet?
ASME B31.3 is being used for the design of the pipe work...
I don't know what the conditions are but we had some low pressure spools galvanized when I was an apprentice, we had to take the galf off the gramophone by applying heat with an oxy torch and wire brushing the galv off.
No way, I've used a ratchet chain hoist and a soft sling plenty of times in the past for similar uses though.
https://www.riggingwarehouse.com/products/HW01/HW01@@2e12/HW01@@2e12@@2e01.aspx
Thanks ED, yes I've found the numerous articles for carbon steel which is why I'm asking this question, so I can look a bit deeper into this as the client commented they just swapped to seamless pipe and are now getting better life out of the spools.
I would like to understand the root cause a...
I've searched the forum and found this old post which describes what I am looking for almost perfectly, the problem is most of the links shared in that post are no longer working, hence my repost.
Just looking for some articles on grooving corrosion in stainless pipe seams with various acids...
I guess that first msg box was a bit misleading, according to the solver outut:
" *** FATAL *** CP = 0.047 TIME= 07:59:51
Parallel capability is restricted to 2 for this product. "
I was under the impression that the abbility to use more than 2 cores was restricted on some licenses.
I got the below message today I wondered if infact we do have the required licence so tried to enable 4 cores. Now I just get a generic error. Is this the expected result if it's a licensing...
What would you call a swivel flange outside of the US that is more of a ducting flange with no gramophone or raised face or anything, just a laser cut flange.
