Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  • Users: GEE8B
  • Order by date
  1. GEE8B

    Wind load uplift on Foundation question

    And your disagreement is warranted. Mistake is mine RE: the LRFD form of the LC. 0.9D+1.0W was the intended reference. Whiffed badly on that in my haste. Thanks for the correction, Pham.
  2. GEE8B

    I joists parallel to the exterior wall

    I use a similar detail in my designs. Out-of-plane restraint for lower story.
  3. GEE8B

    Avoiding soil related issues

    Simple. Don’t do structural work in the absence of geotechnical recommendations derived from a site-specific subsurface exploration. In the end, structural will get pulled into the lawsuit regardless. But if there is a geotechnical report, and depending on the nature of the building...
  4. GEE8B

    House with Foundation Cracks

    Retain a licensed engineer to help navigate the issue, or have the homeowner retain one. There is no way to know the extent or cause from what little you’ve shared, so any conversation about underpinning is premature and potentially irrelevant.
  5. GEE8B

    Wind load uplift on Foundation question

    Dead load is always downward (direction of gravity). Wind load can be upward or downward (suction/pressure). Wind forces away from the surface are (-). Wind forces towards the surface are (+). So the “W” in 0.6D+W can be negative or positive. Pressure and suction values are typically per...
  6. GEE8B

    Angled wood stud capacities

    If the question is how to determine the force in the diagonal, as has already been stated it is a straightforward vector math problem. If you have a genuine interest in how the force is derived (as opposed to just wanting someone to give you the answer), there are plenty of online resources you...
  7. GEE8B

    Canopy support to brick veneer

    I’m not a fan of trying to run that plate back into the plane of brick. Even if the plate didn’t warp, that’s a tough detail to build. I don’t know how far apart your HSS tube brackets are. If the distance between them is not unreasonable, could you span a bent plate or an HSS section across...
  8. GEE8B

    Classifications for Reinforcing Bars - Eurocode vs ACI

    BridgeSmith- Correct. I believe the elongations listed in the ASTM spec for A706 and for A615 are “total elongations”, which coincide with fracture of the bar. As mentioned above, this isn’t a very valuable attribute from an engineering design standpoint, at least not compared to uniform...
  9. GEE8B

    Classifications for Reinforcing Bars - Eurocode vs ACI

    Thanks HTURKAK. I overlooked the uniform elongation requirement for A706 bar established in ACI318. The fact remains that A615 bars, as well as other non-A706 reinforcements, have no definition for uniform elongation, yet are broadly accepted and specified in numerous structural applications...
  10. GEE8B

    Classifications for Reinforcing Bars - Eurocode vs ACI

    Hi all. in Eurocode, reinforcement for concrete is classified in three groups (A, B, and C), each having a characteristic minimum tensile to yield ratio and an accompanying minimum tensile strain (measured at ultimate, i.e., the highest point on the stress-strain curve). The various available...

Part and Inventory Search