Search results for query: *

not enough room for a mumford link. I will barely have room for a woblink. The panhard rod barely fits as it is. I do agree that it is a superior design. jim

the upper diagrams show lengths that are really not proportional as the formula would show. I wanted to be sure that there is not some other bits that they were not including. jim

Radical cars (sports racer constructors) claim a patented suspension design they call the Nik-link. This design supposedly eliminated the need for ARB's via some complex linkages. I have no Radicals locally (everything else though) and have been unable to find some clear pictures or design...

I am considering implementing a woblink to replace the panhard rod on my SCCA F500 car. Yes, those cars that really don't have much in the way of a real suspension, but I do get close to three inches of travel at all corners. It really works well, despite the lack of real springs or shocks...

yes, sorry for the lack of data-130mph. Ride height is usually between 40-50mm. 120mm would be like have of my Cg. So far-7-17 deg. Is there a limit to length (beyond class rules limitations)?

I drive a small formula car in SCCA competition. Top speeds of mid 130's with good flat cornering. We are allowed a flat bottom (55" width through the sidepods) with no more than a 1" deviation in height across the floor pan. Area before the front axle and after the rear axle are...