Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Tek-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

Search results for query: *

  1. 09091960

    Limit for CP "ON" potentials

    Gents (Brimmer/LttleInch) - Thanks for your feed back. This section of the pipe was excavated and repainted 8 years ago. Under the most recent DCVG carried out in this year shows that overall coating condition of the pipeline is good. Having said that vendor couldn't carryout DCVG for this...
  2. 09091960

    Limit for CP "ON" potentials

    Yes the 12Meter section is protected by sacrificial Anode system. Further as you understood the 12M section is on the plant side and unable to polarize it. Have you come across burried IJ as similar to our pipeline condition?
  3. 09091960

    Limit for CP "ON" potentials

    As we are in the subject of On potential, I thought that I should discuss the following to get others opinion. In few of our compressor stations which separates the main pipeline from the station the insulation joints are buried. Therefore there is a section, which immediately goes under ground...
  4. 09091960

    Limit for CP "ON" potentials

    Thanks Brimmer for the explanation.
  5. 09091960

    Limit for CP "ON" potentials

    Wow, excellent explanation from "brimmer". Lots of facts that I can take it back to our CP vendor and request for his justification for limiting the on potentials for -1400mV. "brimmer" talks about limiting to -2500mV,mainly for safety reasons. What are the safety conserns under high on...
  6. 09091960

    Limit for CP "ON" potentials

    Thanks LittleInch for your comments and encouraging others to join in this discussion.
  7. 09091960

    Limit for CP "ON" potentials

    Under CP,Our burried gas pipelines are protected through 850 off criteria. This is referred to variously as “850 off”, “polarized potential” or “instant off potential”. This criterion is applicable to impressed current and galvanic systems where the protective current can be interrupted...
  8. 09091960

    Cathodic Pretection Criteria for burried pipelines

    Thanks "brimmer" for the above two posts.We have already decided to follow the 100mV criteria for this pipeline. Having said that for certain areas(near compressor stations,foreign crossings etc) we are unable to use 100mV criteria. For my interest I will search into NACE reserch papers relates...
  9. 09091960

    Cathodic Pretection Criteria for burried pipelines

    Hi Guys, Happy new year to all. The articles which I read so far are not directly addressing my point relates to the "ON" potentials. Can someone forward me the details directly adressing my point? Many thanks in advance.
  10. 09091960

    Cathodic Pretection Criteria for burried pipelines

    The criteria for the protection of a buried ferrous structure is to maintain a potential on all parts of the structure equal to, or more negative than, -850 mV with respect to a saturated copper/copper sulfate reference electrode.Further we limit the off potentials to -1150 mV to avoid the...
  11. 09091960

    RSTRENG MYTHOLOGY FOR PIPELINE DEFECT ASSESSMENT

    In 2008 test has been carried out by running a CDP tool followed by AFD tool to only a slected sections of the pipe line. Results shows that significant increased in ERF>1 values when analysis carried out by the pigging company by using AFD/CDP combined method and it was the case in the field...
  12. 09091960

    RSTRENG MYTHOLOGY FOR PIPELINE DEFECT ASSESSMENT

    Hi Brimmer, I'm having difficulty of uploading the file.http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=6dab77c8-bda4-4792-a232-ce8901dd1188&file=Dig_7a.xls
  13. 09091960

    RSTRENG MYTHOLOGY FOR PIPELINE DEFECT ASSESSMENT

    Hi brimmer, Correct.Safety factor 1.39 gives you 10177. Herewith I will attach you diffect for your reference. Another noticable issue in this years dig up program is that significat difference in diffect lengths compair to pgging data. We used the combine (CDP/AFD) pigging tools in our...
  14. 09091960

    RSTRENG MYTHOLOGY FOR PIPELINE DEFECT ASSESSMENT

    Hi Brimmer, Please ignore the grid 2 reading where it shows all the depth with 20% added to the original reading.Therefore 2.91mm is the correct reading taken from the field. As you have seen I have attached above in my mail defect 7 and the combined defect (7 Com). Herewith I will attach the...
  15. 09091960

    RSTRENG MYTHOLOGY FOR PIPELINE DEFECT ASSESSMENT

    Thanks for pointing it out. I mean "RSTRENG methodology"
  16. 09091960

    RSTRENG MYTHOLOGY FOR PIPELINE DEFECT ASSESSMENT

    Please find the attached combined defect calculations (Defect 7 com)http://files.engineering.com/getfile.aspx?folder=2017c70f-b09f-48d8-969e-5db71de9f773&file=Dig_7com.xls
  17. 09091960

    RSTRENG MYTHOLOGY FOR PIPELINE DEFECT ASSESSMENT

    Hi All, Following are the summary of two defects( Named as 7&7A) found in one of our pipelines. As these two defects are 300mm apart under the defect interaction rule we can consider as one defect.(Named as 7 com.) defect 7 ( Assessed defect length of 2.060Meter with an effective defect...
  18. 09091960

    Coating issues on a Pipeline

    Thanks guys. Its always good to have others opinion.
  19. 09091960

    Coating issues on a Pipeline

    Some of the issues related to tape coated old pipelines (> 40 years) is that vast deterioration of coating which leads to corrosion in the pipeline. To mitigate the issues operating companies have to adequately upgrade the CP systems as per the current requirements and carryout pigging...
  20. 09091960

    Identification of Stress Corrosion Cracking

    Thanks Brimmer & all those who were involved in the discusion on SCC which was very helpfull to improve my knowledge in this area.
Back
Top