Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations KootK on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

161 Maiden

XR250

Structural
Jan 30, 2013
5,409
I just started reading about this.

I just don't get it. Wow, they save $6 million going with a risky jet grouting procedure. How could anyone think this was a good idea? With an aspect ratio of 15:1, only 0.2" of differential settlement is required to produce a lean of 3". I can't imagine engineers being that confident in their modeling to sign off on this type of foundation for this project.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

From New York Magazine's Curbed,
... the building hadn’t settled on its foundation properly and was displaying “a bowing or curve in its verticality,”
so it sounds like the trouble became baked in during the course of construction.

Also, from another item on Curbed,
Work on the 670-foot tall structure progressed, but in April 2018, concrete subcontractor RC Structure reported “structural issues, unusual settlement up to three inches, and the building is leaning three inches to the north,” court records show.

Two months later, the subcontractor handling the non-structural curtain wall—an outer covering on the facade of the building—noticed that the frame already installed on the east side terrace was leaning “approximately two inches difference to the north from Floor 11 to 21” and that the building is now “exhibiting a bowing or curve in its verticality,” according to the complaint.

From Google, it looks like a construction error (above the 10th floor) that someone tried to make disappear.

11-21.02.jpg
Google Street View

Street View from relevant time frame.

Nov 2017 to June 2018.jpg

Another possibility is a weather event (weathergamut.com), of note May 2017, about the time they might have been constructing the 10/11th floors.

In terms of precipitation, May was unusually wet. In all, 6.38 inches of rain were measured in Central Park. Of this impressive total, 3.02 inches (47% of the monthly total) fell in just a few hours on May 5, setting a new rainfall record for the date. Another 1.61 inches came down during an unseasonable nor’easter on May 13.

According to the NWS, 3.02 inches of rain was measured in Central Park, setting a new record for the date. The previous record of 1.55 inches had been in place since 1871.

NYCFlooding.jpg
 
Last edited:
That's nothing compared to Millennium Towers in SF...
 
That's nothing compared to Millennium Towers in SF...
For sure. It is a similar situation though. Try to save money by not going to bedrock.
Who knows how bad this one will get if it ever gets occupied.
 
This subject got zero replies a year and a half ago

 
I saw that. I was surprised.
 
The Manhattan tower of the Brooklyn Bridge is maybe 400 meters away.

Its foundations never got to bedrock, and it's been fine for long time (finished in 1876).

I guess that means nothing.
 
The Manhattan tower of the Brooklyn Bridge is maybe 400 meters away.

Its foundations never got to bedrock, and it's been fine for long time (finished in 1876).

I guess that means nothing.
I think it does mean something. I wonder if it is on fill like 161 or residual soils? Looks like they just sunk some caissons and called it good.
 
It sounds like the window contractor is annoyed because their own design was too rigid.
 

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor