Continue to Site

Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations MintJulep on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

17-7 ss wire heat threating options

Status
Not open for further replies.

MrGQ

Automotive
May 22, 2006
2
Hello to all Engineers!
We have two spring makers proposal using 17-7 ss wire, condition C to be meet blue print load requirement: Option 1: heat threat to 900F for 30 minutes and Option 2: Heat threat to 750F for 1 hour. Which one is right? Your comments Please, if any one had similar project.
Thanks.
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

None of the above.

the standard ultra-high strength aging heat treat of 17-7ph is H900 (1hr@900F)

I have the feeling that 750 is below the activation energy for the preciptation to occur. While 900F for 1/2 hr might get what you want, it may not develop the proper distribution and size of the preciptates.
 
As NickE said, 900 F for 1 hour is the usual requirement (SAE J217, SAE AMS 2759/3C). 750 F is DEFINITELY too low, no matter how long the time.
 
Gentlemen, Thank you for information.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor