Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

1991 Street Pontiac Firebird GTA "Factory data" CD .31

Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Lowest production car I can remember is the GM Impact at 0.21, from memory. 0.28 was the target for a long time for fuel efficient cars, but the reality is it doesn't make the car especially efficient in the tests or at legal speeds.

Aero is not a zero cost attribute of the car, and a low CD can force a deterioration in lift characteristics and crosswind stability.



Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376
 
My Fiat Ducato van has Cd = 0.31; of course the A is quite large.

I'd say most modern cars (not trucks) have Cd below 0.31 now.

Tesla model 3 has Cd = 0.23. I think that is the current lowest-Cd production car; if it isn't the lowest, it's close to it.
 
It's easier to get low Cd with high A. Modern cars are bigger so Cd does drop. One thing that made a step change was realising that the flow through the engine bay was significant and you could get 6% typically by tidying that up. Some aerodynamicists run their cars in the windtunnel with the grill blanked off, a detail that gets lost in the marketing spiel. Also there are very substantial differences in results between different tunnels, and even differences when different manufacturers use the same tunnel, due to the test procedures used.

Cheers

Greg Locock


New here? Try reading these, they might help FAQ731-376
 
I used to have an 87 Benz 190D 2.5 and that had a radiator shroud with thermally actuated louvers and aerodynamic covers under the body. I see that listed as Cd .32-.34, that (the W201 body) and the W124 and W126 bodies were when MB got serious about aerodynamics I think.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top