Eng-Tips is the largest engineering community on the Internet

Intelligent Work Forums for Engineering Professionals

  • Congratulations waross on being selected by the Eng-Tips community for having the most helpful posts in the forums last week. Way to Go!

2 hour transit time 5

Status
Not open for further replies.

cvg

Civil/Environmental
Dec 16, 1999
6,868
US
I am working on a project in a remote location. The project is a reinforced concrete box culvert storm drain. The only concrete plant in the area is a 90 minute drive away plus another 10 - 30 minutes waiting to unload so that readymix will be 2 hours total in the mixer. The producer says they have suitable mixes with retarder added that can go that long and meet state DOT specs.

1)should I believe them and

2)anything special I should do in plans / specs / QC to make sure the finished concrete comes out ok?
 
Replies continue below

Recommended for you

Delvo would be an excellent product for this situation (and no I don't work for deGussa). I would not recommend a normal retarder unless it is monitored like a hawk through production as cement chemistry does and will change thus influencing the effectiveness of a normal retarder, not to mention the varying external temperatures you'll be seeing.

Also, as you are air-entraining this mixture, you'll want to monitor the air content, preferably in a hardened state not just with an air meter. Air-entraining agents stabilize the bubbles that develop when mixing. The air content will fall with time and the trend will be towards a coarser bubble structure. Redosing on-site is not always effective and an air meter may not capture this. This will make the concrete freeze-thaw susceptibile and reduce the lifespan of the structure being constructed. Perform a test batch at the ready-mix plant, cast a cylinder after initial mixing is done, set the ready-mix truck aside for 2 hours or so and cast another sample. Have the cylinders tested for hardened air void parameters per ASTM C 457. I would also throw in a couple of production checks as well through the project. The test is not easily done and can be expensive. Given that the nearest plant isn't close, I assume the nearest concrete petrographer is probably a lot further a way. God Bless FedEx though...

I would be deeply concerned about mixing the rock, sand, cement, and admixture and then adding the water on-site. Admixtures can be sucked into dry aggregates rendering them useless. The last thing you need is to transport 10 CY of concrete 2 hours and then find out you can't get the air content in spec. (I might add, at the time you find out it isn't working, you could already have 100 CY in transit).

 
Degussa is now owned by BASF, I think. I wouldn't be concerned about mixing on site if proper attention is paid to what is done - and it depends on what the concrete is used for as well - as I indicated we did may thousands of cubic metres on site and the concrete was "good". One of the reasons is that you are mixing and placing within 10 minutes. It seems like you would have supervision on site so there is full control on observation.
 

Another thought -

We have very high day time temperatures, and quite often the concrete plant will use ice to reduce the mix temperature, as well as start pours at 0100.

uwrockguy is right - test batching is the way to go!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Part and Inventory Search

Sponsor

Back
Top