2007 SP1.1 Available 1

[rfus]

Got it and installed it this morning.

RFUS

 

[Theophilus]

Thanks for the heads-up (star)!

However, remember what Scott said a million times last week:
[red]"If it's not broke, don't fix it!"[/red]

Jeff Mowry

http://www.industrialdesignhaus.com

Reason trumps all. And awe trumps reason.

 

[smcadman]

Have you found what the fixes are? I can download the sp, but the fixes are not listed at the SPR List and Lookup.

SW07 SP1.1

Flores

 

[SBaugh]

What are you trying to say Jeff? - I talk to much!! haha

Regards,

Scott Baugh, CSWP

http://www.scottjbaugh.com

faq731-376

 

[Theophilus]

Yeah, definitely. And sometimes it's worth paying attention.

Jeff Mowry

http://www.industrialdesignhaus.com

Reason trumps all. And awe trumps reason.

 

[SBaugh]

Sometimes... thats true!

,

Scott Baugh, CSWP

http://www.scottjbaugh.com

faq731-376

 

[PDMAdmin]

According to the SW website, only those users who are running 32-bit SW on a 64-bit OS need the SP1.1 upgrade.

 

[SBaugh]

Yes I just found that and think it might cause problems for those that update to 1.1!

Regards,

Scott Baugh, CSWP

http://www.scottjbaugh.com

faq731-376

 

[smcadman]

Yikes, PDMAdmin is correct. I do not know if it would screw up my install if I just updated SW without reading the tech-alert (which is where the info is). It should be noted in the download section instead of a tech alert.

SolidWorks 2007 SP01.1 is LIVE on the web

Note: This update is only necessary if you run the 32bit version of SolidWorks on a 64bit OS (Operating System).

SW07 SP1.0

Flores

 

[SBaugh]

If it does ,then rollback to SP1.0 - Just restart the 1.1 Download and select Rollback.

Regards,

Scott Baugh, CSWP

http://www.scottjbaugh.com

faq731-376

 

[rfus]

Haven't run into any problems running SP1.1 in win32. Everything seems very stable.

 

[SBaugh]

Well they don't give the option to DL just SP1.0 either, so that's really screwed up... they give such a bulletin like that then you only have 1.1 to DL... Iguess that was their intention, but that just seems "As backwards to me".

Regards,

Scott Baugh, CSWP

http://www.scottjbaugh.com

faq731-376