mlevett3
Automotive
- Jun 3, 2016
- 20
I am trying to come up with the stiffness matrix for a 2D system of a frame-torsional spring-frame FE model to grow into a full 3D auto body "stick" model of frames and springs. In the past I've substituted the spring with a stubby beam of equivalent torsional stiffness for 2D, but I'd rather program explicit torsional constants in now. I think that will be easier to work with in 3D. I guess the spring is a type of "connection element"? I've never studied those. I'm figuring that the beam elements share translational DoFs, but not rotational DoFs, since I'm splitting them up with a rotational element.
My current approach is attached. When I program that, clamp the left end, and solve with a vertical force at the right end the results make no sense. If I make the beams really stiff so most deformation happens on the spring, the energy of the flexible spring should almost match the work done by the force. But it doesn't. Can someone point out what I'm doing wrong or point me to a resource that could explain connection spring elements between beams?
My current approach is attached. When I program that, clamp the left end, and solve with a vertical force at the right end the results make no sense. If I make the beams really stiff so most deformation happens on the spring, the energy of the flexible spring should almost match the work done by the force. But it doesn't. Can someone point out what I'm doing wrong or point me to a resource that could explain connection spring elements between beams?